- Joined
- Aug 28, 2021
- Messages
- 7,368
He had over 100 tackles and was 1st team all CUSA. Your idiocy truthfully knows no bounds.
He had over 100 tackles and was 1st team all CUSA. Your idiocy truthfully knows no bounds.
Sorry I meant to put this in another thread, I deleted it within 30 seconds of posting but somehow you already commented on it.
Still a bs porst regardless of the thread.Sorry I meant to put this in another thread, I deleted it within 30 seconds of posting but somehow you already commented on it.
He had over 100 tackles and was 1st team all CUSA. Your idiocy truthfully knows no bounds.
Meh. He's an okay LB but I just think he doesn't turn the needle. He's more of a rotational LB who can play 20-25 snaps then a day 1 starting LB, I worry about his athleticism. He's a great blitzer though so that should help, I think he's another Corey Flagg which is fine.Meh what? You don't want an experienced guy who could play a good amount?
I suppose, I'm just saying Deion has kicked numerous people of his team who weren't good enough, so why can't Mario if he needs to open spots?Still a bs porst regardless of the thread.
Meh. He's an okay LB but I just think he doesn't turn the needle. He's more of a rotational LB who can play 20-25 snaps then a day 1 starting LB, I worry about his athleticism. He's a great blitzer though so that should help, I think he's another Corey Flagg which is fine.
Meh. He's an okay LB but I just think he doesn't turn the needle. He's more of a rotational LB who can play 20-25 snaps then a day 1 starting LB, I worry about his athleticism. He's a great blitzer though so that should help, I think he's another Corey Flagg which is fine.
Nixon had as many tackles last year (104) as our top two LB’s combined.What's ironic is everyone is giddy over Rose (me included). But then some of these same people are meh with Nixon. Both are All CUSA. And our need at LB is just as great as it is at DT.
Nixon had as many tackles last year (104) as our top two LB’s combined.
Can we please stop calling MackBammer a troll at this point?
Why? Not every transfer is going to be a high end starter from day 1. I don't see why there would be an issue if I don't think that about Nixon?Run.
If you watch their film you should only be giddy about one. I’m ok with the take but I view him as a Caleb type maybe not as good. He could start or spilt snaps but he’s no Mauioga.What's ironic is everyone is giddy over Rose (me included). But then some of these same people are meh with Nixon. Both are All CUSA. And our need at LB is just as great as it is at DT.
There’s been no other LB we’ve been discussing that was visiting from the spring portal so now that he has committed feel not free to crap on it.Meh. He's an okay LB but I just think he doesn't turn the needle. He's more of a rotational LB who can play 20-25 snaps then a day 1 starting LB, I worry about his athleticism. He's a great blitzer though so that should help, I think he's another Corey Flagg which is fine.
I agree he's a take for depth. I just don't think he's a clear Power 5 starting LB.I think he’s better than Flagg and our LB depth is scary with an injury or two. I don’t want to rely on true freshman to save us. He’s a take and only for one year to bridge the gap with the freshman.
His group worthy.
Ric Flair worthy?
I think he’s better than Flagg and our LB depth is scary with an injury or two. I don’t want to rely on true freshman to save us. He’s a take and only for one year to bridge the gap with the freshman.