AQM give me facts

[arcane]

LOL at arcane posting the definition of arcane in response to an attorney (MIA########) and dk liking it, since MIA was clearly calling you out on the fact that you are using it improperly

These two bozos must work for the school

I don't know what any of the other posters' professions are. Someone asked me a question, and I answered it. I used to work for the university, but I don't anymore.

 

[McGahee2TheHouse]

Again, since you don't know what the other person did or didn't do, how the eff can you be so sure that the other guy needed to be punished by UM?

The disciplinary committee heard all the facts; you didn't.

Did the police hear all of the facts when deciding that AQM's alleged conduct didn't rise to the level of an arrest?

Crazy that this fight was so serious that it warranted being kicked out of school completely, yet did not warrant being arrested. Can you explain what would account for such a discrepancy?

The victim gets to decide if he even wants to press charges. Maybe he chose not to. Again, you have no more info than I do, or anyone else outside of the people involved, the witnesses, and those who heard the case on the Council.

What is your background in criminal law? You're speaking authoritatively on the subject, so you must be involved in the system. To my knowledge, the victim doesn't decide whether charges are filed or not. The State does.

No, the state does not in many cases. Think of all the cases where someone (such as a spouse) gets hit and it's in the news and you see the line "the victim chose not to file charges."

Oh man, I just came back and read your series of posts where you attempt to explain the charging process, and I can't stop laughing, especially at the bold. Next time you attempt to explain the law, remember that some of us are in a criminal court room every day

 

[hoops156]

Did the police hear all of the facts when deciding that AQM's alleged conduct didn't rise to the level of an arrest?

Crazy that this fight was so serious that it warranted being kicked out of school completely, yet did not warrant being arrested. Can you explain what would account for such a discrepancy?

The victim gets to decide if he even wants to press charges. Maybe he chose not to. Again, you have no more info than I do, or anyone else outside of the people involved, the witnesses, and those who heard the case on the Council.

What is your background in criminal law? You're speaking authoritatively on the subject, so you must be involved in the system. To my knowledge, the victim doesn't decide whether charges are filed or not. The State does.

No, the state does not in many cases. Think of all the cases where someone (such as a spouse) gets hit and it's in the news and you see the line "the victim chose not to file charges."

Oh man, I just came back and read your series of posts where you attempt to explain the charging process, and I can't stop laughing, especially at the bold. Next time you attempt to explain the law, remember that some of us are in a criminal court room every day

Lol everyone here is a lawyer driving a Bentley to the courthouse

 

[The Franchise]

LOL at arcane posting the definition of arcane in response to an attorney (MIA########) and dk liking it, since MIA was clearly calling you out on the fact that you are using it improperly

These two bozos must work for the school

Two pen1ses in a pod. Dorks got clowned by MIA and are patting each other on the back like they just pulled a fast one.

 

[The Franchise]

Did the police hear all of the facts when deciding that AQM's alleged conduct didn't rise to the level of an arrest?

Crazy that this fight was so serious that it warranted being kicked out of school completely, yet did not warrant being arrested. Can you explain what would account for such a discrepancy?

The victim gets to decide if he even wants to press charges. Maybe he chose not to. Again, you have no more info than I do, or anyone else outside of the people involved, the witnesses, and those who heard the case on the Council.

What is your background in criminal law? You're speaking authoritatively on the subject, so you must be involved in the system. To my knowledge, the victim doesn't decide whether charges are filed or not. The State does.

No, the state does not in many cases. Think of all the cases where someone (such as a spouse) gets hit and it's in the news and you see the line "the victim chose not to file charges."

Oh man, I just came back and read your series of posts where you attempt to explain the charging process, and I can't stop laughing, especially at the bold. Next time you attempt to explain the law, remember that some of us are in a criminal court room every day

He saw it on the news though. LULZ at these UM shill accounts making fools of themselves constantly.

 

[dk72]

Did the police hear all of the facts when deciding that AQM's alleged conduct didn't rise to the level of an arrest?

Crazy that this fight was so serious that it warranted being kicked out of school completely, yet did not warrant being arrested. Can you explain what would account for such a discrepancy?

The victim gets to decide if he even wants to press charges. Maybe he chose not to. Again, you have no more info than I do, or anyone else outside of the people involved, the witnesses, and those who heard the case on the Council.

What is your background in criminal law? You're speaking authoritatively on the subject, so you must be involved in the system. To my knowledge, the victim doesn't decide whether charges are filed or not. The State does.

No, the state does not in many cases. Think of all the cases where someone (such as a spouse) gets hit and it's in the news and you see the line "the victim chose not to file charges."

Oh man, I just came back and read your series of posts where you attempt to explain the charging process, and I can't stop laughing, especially at the bold. Next time you attempt to explain the law, remember that some of us are in a criminal court room every day

Ok Judge Judy, please do point out where I'm wrong. In fact, I even looked it up to confirm, and I was correct.

 

[Ibis Wingz]

LOL at arcane posting the definition of arcane in response to an attorney (MIA########) and dk liking it, since MIA was clearly calling you out on the fact that you are using it improperly

These two bozos must work for the school

I don't know what any of the other posters' professions are. Someone asked me a question, and I answered it. I used to work for the university, but I don't anymore.

ar has to stand for Absolute ******.

 

[arcane]

LOL at arcane posting the definition of arcane in response to an attorney (MIA########) and dk liking it, since MIA was clearly calling you out on the fact that you are using it improperly

These two bozos must work for the school

I don't know what any of the other posters' professions are. Someone asked me a question, and I answered it. I used to work for the university, but I don't anymore.

ar has to stand for Absolute ******.

What's wrong with being retarded?

 

[Consigliere]

LOL at arcane posting the definition of arcane in response to an attorney (MIA########) and dk liking it, since MIA was clearly calling you out on the fact that you are using it improperly

These two bozos must work for the school

I don't know what any of the other posters' professions are. Someone asked me a question, and I answered it. I used to work for the university, but I don't anymore.

ar has to stand for Absolute ******.

Extremely funny

 

[MIA42178]

The victim gets to decide if he even wants to press charges. Maybe he chose not to. Again, you have no more info than I do, or anyone else outside of the people involved, the witnesses, and those who heard the case on the Council.

What is your background in criminal law? You're speaking authoritatively on the subject, so you must be involved in the system. To my knowledge, the victim doesn't decide whether charges are filed or not. The State does.

No, the state does not in many cases. Think of all the cases where someone (such as a spouse) gets hit and it's in the news and you see the line "the victim chose not to file charges."

Oh man, I just came back and read your series of posts where you attempt to explain the charging process, and I can't stop laughing, especially at the bold. Next time you attempt to explain the law, remember that some of us are in a criminal court room every day

Ok Judge Judy, please do point out where I'm wrong. In fact, I even looked it up to confirm, and I was correct.

Victim is not party to case in criminal court. Domestics get tossed bc they happen in home usually w victim being only witness. If only witness backs out there is no evidence (or a lot less) so it is dropped.
Many times (murders for instance) the victim cannot say whether they wish to press charges. Charges are based on all evidence available.

In this particular case, I keep reading about eye witnesses. So there was additional evidence that didn't apparently rise to the level needed for an arrest--probable cause.

 

[McGahee2TheHouse]

arcane, when are you going to give us some lessons on hearsay?

I'm all ears.

 

[The Franchise]

LOL at arcane posting the definition of arcane in response to an attorney (MIA########) and dk liking it, since MIA was clearly calling you out on the fact that you are using it improperly

These two bozos must work for the school

I don't know what any of the other posters' professions are. Someone asked me a question, and I answered it. I used to work for the university, but I don't anymore.

ar has to stand for Absolute ******.

What's wrong with being retarded?

You're what's wrong with being retarded.

 

[WhatTheHell]

You gotta admire the mindless Golden/administration supporters. They will not stop. They're like the terminator. Or zombies.

Even when people clearly more knowledgeable than them on a certain subject weigh in, they don't care. They just keep pushing forward. Their limbs are blown off but they'll keep chasing your car down until you can get to safety.

Aim for the head.

 

[De Pinga]

What is your background in criminal law? You're speaking authoritatively on the subject, so you must be involved in the system. To my knowledge, the victim doesn't decide whether charges are filed or not. The State does.

No, the state does not in many cases. Think of all the cases where someone (such as a spouse) gets hit and it's in the news and you see the line "the victim chose not to file charges."

Oh man, I just came back and read your series of posts where you attempt to explain the charging process, and I can't stop laughing, especially at the bold. Next time you attempt to explain the law, remember that some of us are in a criminal court room every day

Ok Judge Judy, please do point out where I'm wrong. In fact, I even looked it up to confirm, and I was correct.

Victim is not party to case in criminal court. Domestics get tossed bc they happen in home usually w victim being only witness. If only witness backs out there is no evidence (or a lot less) so it is dropped.
Many times (murders for instance) the victim cannot say whether they wish to press charges. Charges are based on all evidence available.

In this particular case, I keep reading about eye witnesses. So there was additional evidence that didn't apparently rise to the level needed for an arrest--probable cause.

MOOB

 

[Ibis Wingz]

arcane, when are you going to give us some lessons on hearsay?

I'm all ears.

He needs to google it before he can inculcate you.

 

[Consigliere]

The victim gets to decide if he even wants to press charges. Maybe he chose not to. Again, you have no more info than I do, or anyone else outside of the people involved, the witnesses, and those who heard the case on the Council.

What is your background in criminal law? You're speaking authoritatively on the subject, so you must be involved in the system. To my knowledge, the victim doesn't decide whether charges are filed or not. The State does.

No, the state does not in many cases. Think of all the cases where someone (such as a spouse) gets hit and it's in the news and you see the line "the victim chose not to file charges."

Oh man, I just came back and read your series of posts where you attempt to explain the charging process, and I can't stop laughing, especially at the bold. Next time you attempt to explain the law, remember that some of us are in a criminal court room every day

Ok Judge Judy, please do point out where I'm wrong. In fact, I even looked it up to confirm, and I was correct.

***ed up a great opportunity to drop a Judge Reinhold. No idea why you went with Judge Judy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaK_FgrIlYY

 

[arcane]

arcane, when are you going to give us some lessons on hearsay?

I'm all ears.

The primary definition of the word "hearsay," according to the link I provided earlier, is "information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor." My Random House College Dictionary defines "hearsay" as "unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another." It then gives a separate definition of "hearsay evidence."

When one is faced with a word having one or more meanings, one interprets it according to context. Thus, for instance, reference to a wax seal on a letter would not usually be interpreted to denote an aquatic mammal.

The sentence in which I used the word "hearsay" was "Then admit to yourself that much of your picture of what happened involves a large measure of reliance on hearsay supplemented by your own imagination."

I was referring to various statements such as "he beat the **** out of him", "it was self-defense", etc. Since my comment never mentioned court testimony and described an aspect of what I called "your picture," I relied on each individual to realize that he or she had not just emerged from a court hearing on the matter. I apologize if I confused anyone.

 

[weownfsu]

arcane, when are you going to give us some lessons on hearsay?

I'm all ears.

The primary definition of the word "hearsay," according to the link I provided earlier, is "information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor." My Random House College Dictionary defines "hearsay" as "unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another." It then gives a separate definition of "hearsay evidence."

When one is faced with a word having one or more meanings, one interprets it according to context. Thus, for instance, reference to a wax seal on a letter would not usually be interpreted to denote an aquatic mammal.

The sentence in which I used the word "hearsay" was "Then admit to yourself that much of your picture of what happened involves a large measure of reliance on hearsay supplemented by your own imagination."

I was referring to various statements such as "he beat the **** out of him", "it was self-defense", etc. Since my comment never mentioned court testimony and described an aspect of what I called "your picture," I relied on each individual to realize that he or she had not just emerged from a court hearing on the matter. I apologize if I confused anyone.

You didn't really confuse anybody except for yourself.

btw dycane when will you be back to admit that you were incorrect about the administration? You were happy to beat your chest and tell everybody how this had nothing to do with the administration, but you were completely wrong. Show yourself.

 

[arcane]

You didn't really confuse anybody except for yourself.

Please explain what you mean. I also invite McGahee2TheHouse, who indicates that he liked your comment, to explain why he liked it.

 

[weownfsu]

You didn't really confuse anybody except for yourself.

Please explain what you mean. I also invite McGahee2TheHouse, who indicates that he liked your comment to explain why he liked it.

When you write a novel trying to explain what hearsay is and there's 6 attorneys and/or law students posting on the same page you did it, you just end up looking stupid.