Anthony McFarland, Jr.

****....You ain't got to get hot about it lol.

I rarely expect highly rated oos of kids to come , don't think that's " wimpy" but more being realistic. The odds say they rarely do commit . If they do come great , but if they don't I'm not disappointed.

Richt probably changes that but that's just how I've always viewed recruiting. And history usually prices my theory.

**** golden was able to get OOS kids

Key word " highly rated " oos kids

AQM, kaaya, and elder were highly rated

Aqm couldn't get into ND, Kayaa wasnt highly rated when he committed, he blew up towards the end of the year. That's when the big offers started rolling in, luckily we were the first school to pounce on him. One thing the previous staff did right. Dobard was highly rated too, but the point is they're far and few between.

The percentages are super low. So I don't set myself up for the disappointment. Keeps my jimmies from being rustled.

Njoku is another OOS the previous staff got right. I hate giving them credit but its true
 

Advertisement
Maryland guys all seem really confident he's a Terp lock.

That's more to do with the momentum the recruiting staff has, rather than anything McFarland himself has said. Which, I guess it's fine to think because you have gotten something, you will get all. But that really isn't a logic the rest of us should worry about.

cant count all the locks we lost out on with golden
 
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.
 
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown
 
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

Negative nellie shows up again!
 
Advertisement
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

Negative nellie shows up again!
I got a new Franchise Wounded Warrior, who is going to chase me around because he got his feelings hurt on the football board. Welcome to my fan club, jizzrocket.
 
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

Negative nellie shows up again!

So he stats a fact and he's a negative nellie??
 
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

Negative nellie shows up again!

So he stats a fact and he's a negative nellie??

He's emotional and wounded, so he's following me all over CIS showing the world how much another man he doesn't know hurt him so deeply emotionally. Hopefully, he'll cry it out of his system and quit dragging the boards into his feelings.
 
Advertisement
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

Negative nellie shows up again!
I got a new Franchise Wounded Warrior, who is going to chase me around because he got his feelings hurt on the football board. Welcome to my fan club, jizzrocket.
Lmao get them Franchise
 
WOW!!! Looks like a bigger version of Noel Devine!!

No
**** no

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

hows that?
https://youtu.be/J9Bz76JIJXE

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Man, his tape was the first recruit i ever looked up years back. He's literally the reason i started following recruiting. Still don't think i've seen a better FL RB tape. Speed, quickness, balance, vision, deceptive power. Kid had it all.
 
Advertisement
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

agree
 
**** no

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

hows that?
https://youtu.be/J9Bz76JIJXE

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Man, his tape was the first recruit i ever looked up years back. He's literally the reason i started following recruiting. Still don't think i've seen a better FL RB tape. Speed, quickness, balance, vision, deceptive power. Kid had it all.
Dude was squatting 500 lbs. as a sophomore in high school. There was a video of it floating around on YouTube of it while I was in high school...

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
 
Advertisement
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

I know very few will agree - but I just don't see it. McFarland looks short and compact, a little stiff, and good but not great speed. He looks like a straight line guy. He looks like a very good receiver out of the backfield. All of that reminds me of Walton.

In regards to McFarland's speed - ESPN has him as a 4.6 guy. And for his highlights, look at Lorenzo Harrison.

Harrison played in the same backfield as McFarland at DeMatha, and had a better year last year. Harrison is 5' 8", 185 - and was the #55 RB in last years class (signed with Maryland). Harrison is consistently breaking tackles and long runs in his highlights too.

I just think if McFarland was the real deal, he would've had a much better year than Harrison, who's an average prospect.

McFarland.webp

[video=youtube;Fgq5fEF2qVo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgq5fEF2qVo[/video]
 
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

I know very few will agree - but I just don't see it. McFarland looks short and compact, a little stiff, and good but not great speed. He looks like a straight line guy. He looks like a very good receiver out of the backfield. All of that reminds me of Walton.

In regards to McFarland's speed - ESPN has him as a 4.6 guy. And for his highlights, look at Lorenzo Harrison.

Harrison played in the same backfield as McFarland at DeMatha, and had a better year last year. Harrison is 5' 8", 185 - and was the #55 RB in last years class (signed with Maryland). Harrison is consistently breaking tackles and long runs in his highlights too.

I just think if McFarland was the real deal, he would've had a much better year than Harrison, who's an average prospect.

View attachment 36486

[video=youtube;Fgq5fEF2qVo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgq5fEF2qVo[/video]

I agree on the speed part. Would love to see him in this class because he is good. Just not the game changer ppl say. At least from his film.
 
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

I know very few will agree - but I just don't see it. McFarland looks short and compact, a little stiff, and good but not great speed. He looks like a straight line guy. He looks like a very good receiver out of the backfield. All of that reminds me of Walton.

In regards to McFarland's speed - ESPN has him as a 4.6 guy. And for his highlights, look at Lorenzo Harrison.

Harrison played in the same backfield as McFarland at DeMatha, and had a better year last year. Harrison is 5' 8", 185 - and was the #55 RB in last years class (signed with Maryland). Harrison is consistently breaking tackles and long runs in his highlights too.

I just think if McFarland was the real deal, he would've had a much better year than Harrison, who's an average prospect.

View attachment 36486

[video=youtube;Fgq5fEF2qVo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgq5fEF2qVo[/video]

You lost me at "short and compact." How is that not a great thing for a RB? I strongly prefer RBs in the 5-7 to 5-11 range with a stout build. Tall, thin guys work out well at WR or QB or DB, but generally not RB.

Give me a Frank Gore at 5'9 220, Barry Sanders at 5'8 200, Emmit Smith at 5'9 210. That build makes you much tougher to tackle.
 
I have a lot of concerns about McFarland's upside. I think he's closer to Mark Walton from a talent standpoint. I don't think he'll be a game changer as a player.

BUT - I think he's extremely important from a recruiting perception standpoint. Signing a highly ranked player from out of state early should go a long ways with recruiting momentum. It'll be a helpful boost in getting other big name recruits to join the class.

Walton never once showed the game-breaking speed and home run hitting ability that McFarland has already shown

I know very few will agree - but I just don't see it. McFarland looks short and compact, a little stiff, and good but not great speed. He looks like a straight line guy. He looks like a very good receiver out of the backfield. All of that reminds me of Walton.

In regards to McFarland's speed - ESPN has him as a 4.6 guy. And for his highlights, look at Lorenzo Harrison.

Harrison played in the same backfield as McFarland at DeMatha, and had a better year last year. Harrison is 5' 8", 185 - and was the #55 RB in last years class (signed with Maryland). Harrison is consistently breaking tackles and long runs in his highlights too.

I just think if McFarland was the real deal, he would've had a much better year than Harrison, who's an average prospect.

View attachment 36486

[video=youtube;Fgq5fEF2qVo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fgq5fEF2qVo[/video]

Going to have to disagree with you there. Watch Harrison's and then McFarland's tape back to back. The lateral quickness, vision, and how fast he hits the hole are major differences I see between the two. Plus Harrison was doing a lot of east and west running which I absolutely hate he can get away with it in high school but not college, McFarland rarely got caught from behind. I don't know to me McFarland is clearly the superior RB. But, hey these are highlights i would have to see him in person.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top