Air Noland

Advertisement
In the grand scheme of things I'd rather us have Air Noland than Mateer due to the fact he has multiple years, a super high ceiling, and it gives us more money to get difference makers on defense. I'm not saying he is better than Mateer RIGHT NOW. I just rather have someone you can build around going forward.
1734385839187.gif
 
In the grand scheme of things I'd rather us have Air Noland than Mateer due to the fact he has multiple years, a super high ceiling, and it gives us more money to get difference makers on defense. I'm not saying he is better than Mateer RIGHT NOW. I just rather have someone you can build around going forward.
20231207_100859.jpg
 
In the grand scheme of things I'd rather us have Air Noland than Mateer due to the fact he has multiple years, a super high ceiling, and it gives us more money to get difference makers on defense. I'm not saying he is better than Mateer RIGHT NOW. I just rather have someone you can build around going forward.
It’s a bidding war every year
 
Advertisement
You are going to be the same person on here crying when you find out Mateer has a no contact tag on him... You will also be the same person on here complaining if Air Noland ends up killing it somewhere else, meanwhile Emory is going 17/35 for 175 yards 0 TD (9 of the 17 being bubble screens).
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
You are going to be the same person on here crying when you find out Mateer has a no contact tag on him... You will also be the same person on here complaining if Air Noland ends up killing it somewhere else, meanwhile Emory is going 17/45 for 175 yards 0 TD (9 of the 17 being bubble screens).

1734386243848.gif
 
I mean even if Mateer comes we should look at taking a kid like this. We can’t continue buying 1 yr rentals every year.
I understand the sentiment and even agree that we should look at Noland even if Mateer does come, but my question is what is wrong with 1 yr rentals? Oklahoma went from Mayfield to Murray to Hurts to Gabriel and then tried their own recruit and went 6-6.

I get it won't always work that way, but if we are a destination for portal QBs, I have no problem picking from the best for as long as it works.

Recruiting HS quarterbacks is becoming overrated.
 
It’s a bidding war every year
It's only a bidding war(for P4 QBs) if the team has a bad season or if a player from a smaller schoo/stagel is trying to move up in competition. I have yet to see a myriad of QBs contemplating leaving the upper echelon universities coming off of a successful team/individual season. You are correct in regards to the positions though.
 
Advertisement
I understand the sentiment and even agree that we should look at Noland even if Mateer does come, but my question is what is wrong with 1 yr rentals? Oklahoma went from Mayfield to Murray to Hurts to Gabriel and then tried their own recruit and went 6-6.

I get it won't always work that way, but if we are a destination for portal QBs, I have no problem picking from the best for as long as it works.

Recruiting HS quarterbacks is becoming overrated.
It’s the talent pool. You’re dependent on it.
 
Advertisement
It’s the talent pool. You’re dependent on it.
Definitely true. I do think QB is a position where there are options every year, but you are right, it would be nice to develop a multi-year guy. I just think that right now, we need to stack a few 10-win seasons and I am not sure we can rely on a guy with no experience quite yet.
 
In the grand scheme of things I'd rather us have Air Noland than Mateer due to the fact he has multiple years, a super high ceiling, and it gives us more money to get difference makers on defense. I'm not saying he is better than Mateer RIGHT NOW. I just rather have someone you can build around going forward.

1734390512241.png
 
Advertisement
Back
Top