Poptimus
Senior
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
- Messages
- 4,969
This is spot on. Mathematically, the odds that Miami, Clemson, and SMU all finish undefeated in conference play is very low. It is the equivalent of needing an 11-game moneyline parlay to hit, since 11 ACC games would need to all go one way.Updated after last weeks games: Clemson holds a half game lead over Miami with conference opponent's in-conference record of 16-21, Miami's at 16-22, and SMU 2.5 back from Miami at 13-24.
I actually went through and assumed the 3 teams win out at 8-0 and then took the FPI prediction for all other games - that actually results in Miami with a strong lead for the 1 seed and Clemson being left out.
According to FPI predictions - Miami opponents would end up at 28-36 (43%), Clemson opponents would end up at 24-40 (38%), and SMU opponents would end up at 25-39 (39%).
Some key shake up games for the 3 team race down the stretch are: Clemson vs the 3 remaining teams on their schedule (VT, Louisville, Pitt), SMU/Pitt - obviously any loss in those games makes it irrelevant, GT/NCST, Syracuse/BC, and Cal/Syracuse.
Just the way the schedules shake out and the overlap down the stretch, I'm sure it's mathematically possible, but it seems like a very slim chance Miami is the one left out. Not a lot of H2H of uncommon opponents left and lots of games are a clean wash of a .500 net result on your schedule regardless of the winner.
Interesting question.. would you rather see Clemson or SMU in the ACCCG?
However, even if it was to happen, a 2.5 game edge over SMU - which as you note Miami has now - is HUGE. I can’t get into quantifying the permutations but I would venture a guess the odds of Miami, Clemson, and SMU going undefeated in conference play AND a 2.5 game deficit being made up by SMU’s non-common ACC opponents versus ours, is somewhere in the <5% odds range.