articles
Comments (248)
Where will those reports be found, exactly? Asking for some friends.
Back up the Brinks Truck for Mateer! Otherwise it’s a 7-5/8-4 season next year!
There is not a Qb in America that will over come the regression we are going to go through on offense next year. Not 1. Or sure tf isn’t going to Emory Williams. We don’t have the defense or or the running game to win that way. 7.5 is our total with him. Id rather just play Nickel and go 7-5 anyway
Last edited:
The defense can’t regress to the mean and improve tho? Yall make no sense.
What do you think of these 2 to add
All conference usa
I wanna say Guidry recruited him to Marshall originally. Dont know their current relationship. But he should be a 1 year rental on the cheap that may know the defense already. I know at FIU the games i watched he was a for sure tackler and is built well.
Would have to be a medical check he didnt play this year.
has reps at nickel and deep safety. I could get contact for this one so if anyone could get it to coaches/
Advertisement
Agreed. This staff has proven under Guidry it cannot coach up anyone… you need to hand Guidry a sure fire Day 2 picks at DB
It can but our offense was so over the mean that the defense would have to improve astronomically. Consider that if we dropped to just 25, we would average 11 points less than this year at 33 ppg from 44 ppg. If our defense went to 25th overall in scoring defense (we finished 60th), we would only improve by 3 ppg. What is the equivalent improvement needed to offset the -11ppg assuming we come in at 25th on offense? We were 38th in 2023 at 30 ppg, so I’m giving a bump from that. I’ll hang up and listen
It’s crazy cause we went 5-7 & 7-5 n this is prolly the most negative I’ve seen this board since I started coming on here. Can’t make past 2 posts without the ****ting on every piece of news starts.
None of these QBs, mateer included, are replicating this non-playoff, non-ACCCG year we had with Cam Ward at QB unless the defense gets legit fixed.
Advertisement
I don’t buy for a second that Emory as qb1 is even being considered by Mario. Any chatter to that effect is to keep Emory from jumping in the portal in case Ward changes his mind about playing in the bowl game. Mario has to show that this year wasn’t a fluke and continue the momentum from this season. There’s no way he risks going into the season with a qb room of Emory, Judd, and Luke who between them would enter the season with 2 career starts, 55 completions, and 4 tds.
You left Bain out of your DT mix. He is too slow and fat for edge imo.
Just say you don’t like the guy and throw a tantrum in a corner.
The only thing stupid is believing a kid 3 years into a P4 strength program and put on 20 pounds couldn’t improve an any of those areas until proven otherwise.
Exactly and at worst we’re a power run team with an outstanding O-line and 3 talented backs with that improved defense. Pretty sure Penn St. made the playoffs and the Big 10 championship doing that.
Advertisement
It’s Mateer or bust. Maybe Ewers or Nuss if one becomes available. Resources have been put in place to give Mateer a godfather deal. If that falls through it’ll be Emory from what I’m told and we’ll spend big giving him playmakers. I think we’re gonna need some patience on this one y’all
Advertisement
I’ve been critical of Emory but if the options are going with him next year and reallocating the funds to securing a monster Defense vs spending $1 million on Mendoza and hoping dudes like Karnely are the answer then it’s a no brainer give me option A
And "fixed" doesn't mean just upgrading the talent if it's the same scheme/non-adjustment one trotted out there this year under this DC..
*whispers*
….We need to give Mateer playmakers too
All jokes aside, I know you are just sharing what you’ve been told. Don’t mind me I’m just thinking out loud
.
Fixed means anyway they can change the level of play - adding players who are actually good and making sure whatever scheme we run functions.
