articles
Comments (248)
Saying you can't win the acc with a lesser qb doesn't make sense, a good qb will work in the system, if you sure up the defense and get Will Howard level play from your qb you can definitely win the ACC.
I'm judging based off what I've seen with my own two eyes from every snap he's played.
Unfortunately, you're not going to hear any no bullshxt reports in the Spring about him. In fact, I would wager all the reports you'll hear & read will be complete bullshxt.
Sure he could be the QB of the team & theoretically win games, but I'm almost certain were he to be the starter we're not winning more than 8 & I bet money Vegas would agree.
What about Mario thus far has said it’s possible?
Don’t keep wasting time and begging silver
What in god’s name has Emory done to make some of you think he can even be a Will Howard or Klubnik level QB, I am so lost.
Advertisement
Judd Anderson?
These are the spots I was led to believe we are looking for sure starters(2 weeks ago) at C, Slot, DT, LB, Nickel and Free. Bringing in more to compete. If some of those start, others will leave. As D mentioned if Mesidor leaves, I believe we look for a starting DE. Obviously, if Mateer hit the portal and came here, he starts.
If you look at Mendoza's stats, they are very similar to Cam's in his last year at Wash st before coming over here. Just saying.
Cam 2023
Mendoza this year
Gonna agree to disagree...this year taught us you need a balanced team. None of the QB's left in the playoffs are better than Cam.....but every single one of those teams are more balanced offensive/defensively than we were.
If you HAVE to choose...you take an Emory with a great secondary as opposed to a Cam with a garbage one.
Advertisement
Wtf has Klubnik done before this year. There’s this thing called improvement. Maybe you should trust the OC that developed Clayton Tune, Geno smith, Nick Mullins, and D’Eriq King might know a thing or 2 about QBs
Transitive property never works in football. We could have the '85 Bears defense but if we don't have a competent QB it's null and void. It's not an either or discussion.
Just wait until Emory wears number 11 next year
Advertisement
We hyped Jadais Richard last cycle as a CB1 type too... thank you for your honesty.
True.
Defense is the number one indicator of success. 7 of the Playoff teams have a defense rank in the top ten in yds/play.
Looking at Offense. Only 3 playoff teams are in the top ten.
Last year Mich had the best Def and they won it all.
Always bet on a good D to beat a good O.
Advertisement
Do the words "Ball State" mean anything to you.
For me, it's the locker-room celebration videos. He hypes me up.
Just saying what? Did you watch that mf throw a football?
This is such stupid logic. You could hope for improvement from any qb in the country, but if they’ve shown nothing to warrant that then that’s all you’re doing. Hoping.
Emory has a mediocre arm with a low and slow release. He doesn’t move well (being generous here). He couldn’t carry a team in a fairly mediocre class and district of Florida football to a winning season in either of his years there. Wins aren’t a QB stat but if you’re going to be a P4 starter you should be able to win 6 ******* games in that district.
Klubnik is a good athlete with an above average arm who was a big time winner in one of Texas’ toughest classifications. He hasn’t lived up to being a top 10 prospect in the country but there are reasons he was seen that way.
