forums

Xavier Lucas wants to be in the portal but Luke Fickell pays to watch men ramrod his wife

Advertisement
404Usernamenotfound said:
Bro relax guy. You are overly emotional

My comment was not in anyway about the specifics or legal aspects of the case

My comment is about people (or i guess over emotional fans like yourself) being biased in their language.

If you don’t think as a man, signing a contract saying you’re going to do something, and then reneging on the deal is NOT “the right thing to do” then it’s clear you’re either a sleaze ball attorney or your old man didn’t raise you right - or likely both.
Click to expand...
NIL is a business contract. Not a contract with a team, but with businesses looking to pay him for his name, image, and likeness. Business contracts are broken or altered all the time, with associated penalties or paybacks. Backing out for a better offer is not an ethical issue. Now, if he took money and refused to pay it back, that's different. But even that has nothing to do with the school or team, but the business/collective that paid
 
Advertisement
dk72 said:
NIL is a business contract. Not a contract with a team, but with businesses looking to pay him for his name, image, and likeness. Business contracts are broken or altered all the time, with associated penalties or paybacks. Backing out for a better offer is not an ethical issue. Now, if he took money and refused to pay it back, that's different. But even that has nothing to do with the school or team, but the business/collective that paid
Click to expand...


Wisconsin gonna learn...
 
407cane said:
heitner said the ncaa didn't have the power to compel Wisconsin to act - they could just punish Wisconsin for not doing so

kinda seems like the same, but if Wisconsin has made a decision to accept the slap on the wrist that's coming, then there's not really much they can do
Click to expand...

That seems strange to me. The NCAA created the rules for players entering the portal. As such, they have power over this question.

No, the NCAA cannot itself legally compel UW to act. But as the portal rule-maker it would seem the NCAA has the power to make a finding that Lucas has met the requirements to enter the portal, which is simply an application by Lucas, and grant him portal status.

More stuff from Heitner that doesn't make sense.
 
PalyCane said:
That seems strange to me. The NCAA created the rules for players entering the portal. As such, they have power over this question.

No, the NCAA cannot itself legally compel UW to act. But as the portal rule-maker it would seem the NCAA has the power to make a finding that Lucas has met the requirements to enter the portal, which is simply an application by Lucas, and grant him portal status.

More stuff from Heitner that doesn't make sense.
Click to expand...
Heitner knows more about NIL than the average CIS poster
 
Advertisement
PalyCane said:
That seems strange to me. The NCAA created the rules for players entering the portal. As such, they have power over this question.

No, the NCAA cannot itself legally compel UW to act. But as the portal rule-maker it would seem the NCAA has the power to make a finding that Lucas has met the requirements to enter the portal, which is simply an application by Lucas, and grant him portal status.

More stuff from Heitner that doesn't make sense.
Click to expand...


Everybody relax for a couple of days. Encouraging news soon.
 
Last edited:
dk72 said:
NIL is a business contract. Not a contract with a team, but with businesses looking to pay him for his name, image, and likeness. Business contracts are broken or altered all the time, with associated penalties or paybacks. Backing out for a better offer is not an ethical issue. Now, if he took money and refused to pay it back, that's different. But even that has nothing to do with the school or team, but the business/collective that paid
Click to expand...
Bro idk how many times I have to explain the same things for you guys to get it

I never said anything about the legal aspect. I only took exception to the use of the words “do the right thing” which is outside any legal parts of this.

Yes people back out of contracts all the time, blah blah blah. But my point was just as the school should be expected to do what’s right, the individual should be expected to do what is right as well.

If you don’t agree with that concept then let’s just agree to disagree
 
404Usernamenotfound said:
Bro idk how many times I have to explain the same things for you guys to get it

I never said anything about the legal aspect. I only took exception to the use of the words “do the right thing” which is outside any legal parts of this.

Yes people back out of contracts all the time, blah blah blah. But my point was just as the school should be expected to do what’s right, the individual should be expected to do what is right as well.

If you don’t agree with that concept then let’s just agree to disagree
Click to expand...


Please stop lying. You can't have it both ways.

You can't sputter about "never said anything about the legal aspect", when the central premise of your *****ing was that Xavier Lucas is not "doing the right thing" in terminating his NIL deal with Wisconsin.

Then you had the nerve to say there were "reports" that he took money from Wisconsin, even though those "reports" were from *****y cheesehead fans and not from any reputable news reporters. Plus you ignored Darren Heitner (Xavier's lawyer) saying that Xavier had taken no money and owed no money to Wisconsin.

How about you just shut up and stop posting for 48 hours, and then we can revisit the subject at that time.
 
404Usernamenotfound said:
Bro idk how many times I have to explain the same things for you guys to get it

I never said anything about the legal aspect. I only took exception to the use of the words “do the right thing” which is outside any legal parts of this.

Yes people back out of contracts all the time, blah blah blah. But my point was just as the school should be expected to do what’s right, the individual should be expected to do what is right as well.

If you don’t agree with that concept then let’s just agree to disagree
Click to expand...
I agree with the concept of doing what's right. I find you claiming Lucas backing out of a business contract that turned out to not be in his best interest and choosing a better situation as an example of someone not doing right to be ridiculous.
 
Advertisement
TheOriginalCane said:
Please stop lying. You can't have it both ways.

You can't sputter about "never said anything about the legal aspect", when the central premise of your *****ing was that Xavier Lucas is not "doing the right thing" in terminating his NIL deal with Wisconsin.

Then you had the nerve to say there were "reports" that he took money from Wisconsin, even though those "reports" were from *****y cheesehead fans and not from any reputable news reporters. Plus you ignored Darren Heitner (Xavier's lawyer) saying that Xavier had taken no money and owed no money to Wisconsin.

How about you just shut up and stop posting for 48 hours, and then we can revisit the subject at that time.
Click to expand...
Bro stfu with your key board tough talk. You would never speak to anyone like this in person so give it a rest with your aggression and settle the **** down.

You are flat out wrong. My point was about the doing what’s right part and you know it. Go back and read it *****
 
dk72 said:
I agree with the concept of doing what's right. I find you claiming Lucas backing out of a business contract that turned out to not be in his best interest and choosing a better situation as an example of someone not doing right to be ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Back out of an executed agreement is not ridiculous to you, ok we disagree. That’s perfectly fine, I appreciate you able to talk about it without turning this into a huge **** measuring contests on cis
 
Advertisement
Back
Top