SevenNSeven
Junior
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2011
- Messages
- 2,273
Tell me I am reading this incorrectly, we play AT FAU and AT Toledo in the coming years?????
This is a joke right? Who out of their minds scheduled this? Since when did we stoop so low?
They are dumbing down the schedule Fat Albert. Embarrassing.
Actually might not just be about dumbing down the schedule. It's getting increasingly hard to schedule home-and-home games against top competition, since many top-BCS schools don't want to lose the extra home game.
Plus, there's travel costs to consider. If you say, fine, the Alabamas and Michigans of the world won't play us in a home and home, let's play Indiana, or Northwestern, or Utah, or some ****. Well, those schools actually take estimated cost for the away game into consideration, they might decline to play us and instead go with someone closer. So, we're left with the Arkansas States and Toledos of the world. A marquee name actually going to play at one of their dumpy stadiums has value in increased revenue, so they're more willing to do it, rather than take a $1 million dollar payday (a going rate that we simply can't pay due to our lease at Sun Lifeless) to go and lose in a one-game deal at one of the big boys.
Exactly the opposite. The dynamics of the "Strength of schedule" component to the new playoff system is going to mandate that your whole schedule must be filled with Power 5 teams or you wont stand a chance if you are on the bubble. (read Non-SEC with 1 loss)
I'll believe that when I see it in practice.
I will say that expect that our schedule making will follow the same formula that it has for the past 10 years. 1 'big name' FBS team, 2 'mid level' schools (possibly a lesser 'power-5' school), 1 FCS team. The difference is, and what some people seem incapable of understanding, is that the going rate to pay a team like LA Tech to play a single away game has gone up to the point where we can't afford it ($1 million +). We couldn't 10 years ago (think 2003), and we certainly can't now.