- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 3,522
Guys, don't be surprised if UM self-imposes reductions for the 2013 class. The #1 goal is to put this behind us ASAP and build back up. NOT having thr 2013 class absorb some reductions would be somewhat catastrophic as it would just prolong us playing with a hand behind our backs for another year. The U wants to pay the price ASAP. Its why its so important for us to get 6 wins and be able to drop the bowl. If we could somehow win the Coastal and drop the ACCCG too, it could go a long, long way towards getting our spanking done sooner, without affecting recruiting.
You don't have to win 6 and then drop the bowl. You can do it now and be fine.
I doubt we self impose a second game, I believe we would be the first school to ever do that.
If we beat VT, Duke and UVA...or somehow get a chance to get to the ACC Champ, I wouldn't entertain this self imposed postseason ban at all.
No, no.. the whole goal is to try to mitigate scholarship losses... you are trying to drop as many post-season games voluntarily in advance so that when the NCAA finally DOES drop the hammer, you've already self-imposed a lot on yourself, which may lead them to only penalize you a few scholarships.
Scholarships are everything.
While I agree. This is the NCAA not the Florida Penal Code. Does the NCAA allow you to plea bargain or negotiate punishment? We did the bowl ban in year one as a sign of good faith, I don't believe giving another one allows you to have less scholarships given up.
What do I know though?
Maybe the NCAA has a scale
X Scholarships Loss = Y Years of Bowl Ban
Z Years of Probation = W in Fines
I don't know honestly but if somehow we win and have the opportunity to get to the ACC Champ game, I think we should go.
There is no concrete rule or anything, but there is a sum total of punishment, and if UM gives up 2-3 post-season games, and the revenue that comes with them, you can be sure that the committee will take that into account when they decide whether or not to accept our self-imposed punishment or add on.
As you said, maybe there is a scale, maybe there isn't, but the most important thing, the only important thing really, is recruiting. And giving up post season games this year might not only help us keep our scholarship penalties down, but it doesn't affect recruiting as the kids in the 2013 class won't be missing these games. Recruiting is everything right now. Not back-dooring a 6-6 team into a 2nd loss to FSU.