Chicken_N_Roffles
Senior
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 4,011
Which one is facing the best competition?
All are facing good competition, but A and C are facing better than B
All three play against high-level comp in South Florida... choose one (all are 2013)
Player A
89 ATT - 1097 YDS - 12.3 YPC - 13 TD
Player B
145 ATT - 1263 YDS - 8.7 YPC - 14 TD
Player C
125 ATT - 1136 YDS - 9.1 YPC - 18 TD
Peter why is Tice rated a three star? His film looks better than a lot of the four star guys?He also plays great competition.
Boot Dillard without giving him a chance on the field lol.Nice guy.I hate it when they speed up the film on these highlights. I'd like to get a look at Tice's real life speed, but he did have some impressive runs, good feet and balance. Definitely like him better than Dillard, but I like Greg Bryant better than Tice.
If we were taking a full class this year I'd be fine with Chestnut too, but we've already got two smallish backs in Duke and Crawford.
I'd be fine with booting Dillard and taking a class of Bryant & Tice.
I hate it when they speed up the film on these highlights. I'd like to get a look at Tice's real life speed, but he did have some impressive runs, good feet and balance. Definitely like him better than Dillard, but I like Greg Bryant better than Tice.
If we were taking a full class this year I'd be fine with Chestnut too, but we've already got two smallish backs in Duke and Crawford.
I'd be fine with booting Dillard and taking a class of Bryant & Tice.
I hate it when they speed up the film on these highlights. I'd like to get a look at Tice's real life speed, but he did have some impressive runs, good feet and balance. Definitely like him better than Dillard, but I like Greg Bryant better than Tice.
If we were taking a full class this year I'd be fine with Chestnut too, but we've already got two smallish backs in Duke and Crawford.
I'd be fine with booting Dillard and taking a class of Bryant & Tice.
Peter why is Tice rated a three star? His film looks better than a lot of the four star guys?He also plays great competition.
Because he burst onto the scene this season. Nobody knew about him last year because he wasn't even their #1 back
Bryant seems a little slow to me. Tice seems to be faster, bigger and doesn't mind bowling over people. Go get him Golden. Better #'s than Collins against better competition. Maybe, just maybe Collins is a little over rated. He would be a great addition to Duke.
r
I hate it when they speed up the film on these highlights. I'd like to get a look at Tice's real life speed, but he did have some impressive runs, good feet and balance. Definitely like him better than Dillard, but I like Greg Bryant better than Tice.
If we were taking a full class this year I'd be fine with Chestnut too, but we've already got two smallish backs in Duke and Crawford.
I'd be fine with booting Dillard and taking a class of Bryant & Tice.
Ok Peter, have you seen all of them play? And who would you choose and why?
Peter why is Tice rated a three star? His film looks better than a lot of the four star guys?He also plays great competition.
Because he burst onto the scene this season. Nobody knew about him last year because he wasn't even their #1 back
Ok Peter, have you seen all of them play? And who would you choose and why?
Peter why is Tice rated a three star? His film looks better than a lot of the four star guys?He also plays great competition.
Because he burst onto the scene this season. Nobody knew about him last year because he wasn't even their #1 back
Yes, I've seen them all play. If Collins is off the board and I had to choose between Tice and Chestnut, I would take Chestnut because he has great feet, quickness, and strength.
He is a good short-yardage back even though he's on the shorter side. I like Tice, but that running style scares me. He fumbles a lot too
Side-note: Why do we insist that there must be a "Workhorse" back in this class? It's not like they are riding Mike James for 20 carries a game or anything like that. Duke is an incredible short-yardage back/goal line back with has a great nose for the 1st down/end zone. I say just bring in the best back out there that you can.
I laugh when I see people post something like "We don't need Chestnut because he's too similar to Duke." Huh? You don't want somebody that is similar to Duke? I'm not comparing Chestnut to Duke, but their styles are similar and Chestnut can break a game open like Duke.
Who has Chesnut received offers from?
I like. This kid runs like a bulldog. If he can get up to the 220's, I really like this back.
[video=youtube_share;iImNFSZdyhI]http://youtu.be/iImNFSZdyhI[/video]