I get not wanting to overpay on the surface of things. The thing I don't get is the misreads or miscalculations on where we actually stand when were up against say, Bama, LSU, OSU, Clemson, OU, UGA. When you are head to head against those big dogs, knowing their performance outputs on the field and in the draft, do the coaches reasonably think "matching" offers is going to get those battles won at a high close rate? I'm not saying you won't have some success, i.e. Lightfoot, James Williams, etc., but to not at least have the mindset of "Well we may have to come over the top on these guys if we want to close this" then they are really betting on themselves in a big way that the season is going to play out for them and pay dividends. And honestly, it wouldn't shock me if one season of better results is enough to not have to pay the "suck tax" and then some. JMO.