Jeez, guys, where have you been?
How in Hades do you think it's been working in the South (SEC) for the past decades?? They don't pull a Shapiro! That's a direct contact! That's about as dumb as anyone can possibly be.
For decades and decades - the money goes through the congregations. The preacher gets his cut, and the FAMILY gets the money - NOT the damned player.
The congregation isn't taxed on the money, the person(s) writing the checks get a tax deduction for charity giving, and the player is clean. He never did NOTHING. He goes where he's told.
See what you boys miss by not attending Sunday school? Lots and lots of top talents . . .
Just bc it's not taxed it still has to be accounted for...and those boys giving ain't getting no tax write off lol
Lots of local southern congregations have their normal contributions. Then there are the special contributions. Special contributions are not comingled with normal contributions. If someone suggests that a special contribution be added to a Sunday normal contribution, strictly for assisting a family to send a (special) son off to college, they pass the trays and there are both checks and cash. Nothing wrong with this, and the IRS has no frikkin' way of knowing this, as it's not part of the normal contribution. Nor would they likely ever give a tinker's ****.
So they take that special contribution and if one has a satchel of cash, it doesn't go into the offering plates. It's passed to the preacher in private as part of the special contribution - as it wouldn't be practical for one or more folks with thousands of dollars to overload the small contribution plates. In exchange for holding the special contribution, the preacher/church gets something like a 10% tithing fee for handling/hosting the event.
The preacher is happy, the church is happy to help one of their own, and I can guarantee you the family is happy.
There are several variations of this, dependent on the local congregation and parties involved, but the bottom line is it's the means of NOT having direct contact with a recruit - and it's done indirectly with the family informing the recruit where he's going to play. Even on this one day, scores of additional non-members (who were contacted in advance, and made out specific checks in advance) can have their multi-hundred dollar checks placed in the contribution plate during this special contribution, and that is another way of piling it up.
It's just like political contribution limitations. There's lots of ways to get around it, and it's done every day. One guy with a ton of money can have checks that meet lawful limitations sent by all family members, employees are handed cash in exchange for a check written for that amount in their name, friends, neighbors, on and on. So one guy can contribute millions directly to the politician, and still meet the dollar limitations. He just spread it out.
And no, not everything is always accounted for. I can take the very same data provided to issue financial statements, and using generally accepted accounting principles, come up with several different financial statements - all using the identical, same numbers. It's how some items are treated, how they are accounted for, and where they are put. To the degree that the different financial statements are not even close to each other.
First question - capitalization or maximum income? After that, it gets very creative.