We beat 1 team w a winning record

[arcane]

Has it ever been mentioned on here that we only beat one team with a winning record? Probably not, since this is the final week of the reg season. So lulz at all the Doh'rito apologists getting their panties in a bunch over how truly crappy our schedule was. We also only beat 3 teams that are bowl eligible.

Again, if UNC and Pitt can win their bowl games, we will have THREE wins over teams with better than a .500 record. That's saying something.

Same as the Heat.

 

[Ernie McCracken]

For what it's worth, I think we are the reason Florida sucked this year.

They were a good team when we played them, but we broke them.

 

[nwFL Griz]

Has it ever been mentioned on here that we only beat one team with a winning record? Probably not, since this is the final week of the reg season. So lulz at all the Doh'rito apologists getting their panties in a bunch over how truly crappy our schedule was. We also only beat 3 teams that are bowl eligible.

Again, if UNC and Pitt can win their bowl games, we will have THREE wins over teams with better than a .500 record. That's saying something.

You forgot, if FAU wins their bowl game, it will be 4 teams.

 

[El Sabroso]

Soft schedule

 

[Southcane]

Try posting less.


That would create a win-win for all of us.

You think this is a good thread?

I think its a thread where people can discuss the University of Miami football program. THAT is why we have this site. I see this as a thread about strength of schedule. If there are specific sub-topics within the UM football scope of topics that anyone doesnt want to discuss (for whatever reason, "too negative," etc.) then simply avoid those threads.

As a moderator I always find it interesting that people want us to manage the content of the message boards when the culture of the fan base is going south. That's like asking a saturated bandaid to absorb more blood when the wound it still being torn open.

Let people discuss what they want regarding UM football. If you do not want to engage in a discussion on strength of schedule then I suggest you avoid this thread.

Simple.

How about just avoid redundancy and clutter hoping to make a cleaner board? When new information / thoughts are posted to support one sentiment or another, I understand your argument. But encouraging redundancy and repetition does not make a good message board.

Example: 100% of our fans believe our defense is HORRIBLE and coaching is largely to blame for it. How allowing a thread after thread saying the same thing, our defense sucks / fire coach D makes a good message board? Okay, we get it, move on!

As moderators its not our goal to manage redundancy. You see, some people visit this board multiple times a day, some only once a week. Redundancy is a gage of how important an issue is.


Again, if you're a multiple time a day visitor, I suggest that you only click on threads that add to your personal likes. This entire website exists for the whole of Miami Hurricanes fans, not just the ones who tow the company line.

Company line? What company line? "Coaching is largely responsible for our defensive failures" is company line?

We suck we suck we suck.......now I am not saying the company line, happy? God forbid if I said it only once, then I will be towing the company line.

 

[L A M P]

How many teams with losing records beat us? I see progress.

 

[Canesfan1899]

I think some so called fans need to gtfo already. These threads are getting old.

Maybe when you see one, try avoiding it.

Unless mommy is making you.

It really IS this simple. If the thread title does not appeal to YOU, simply avoid clicking on that thread.

Or you, as a moderator can keep the conversation from turning into this garbage all the time. It's difficult to avoid these threads when they comprise 85% of the message board.

 

[Dingaan1828]

And the teams we lost to have a combined record of 30-6. You can play this game all week.