Lingard is who he is. He wasn't any better here than there. He was a bad EVALUATION. You can try to tell me that Phillips was a bad evaluation coming out of HS but no one will believe it. He was a top prospect who had injury issues, left the game for a year, then got back into it.
Re Phillips, I haven't denigrated a single thing about us or his development. I'm not 'arguing his development.' You've convinced yourself I'm saying things I'm not. But it's not some magic development dust we put on him or we'd be putting it on everyone. He and Rousseau had the genetics and put in the work. We gave him the opportunity. If we get so much credit for his 'development,' you'd have to be giving us a ton of blame for why other kids aren't equally 'developing' considering how great we're supposed to be at it.
We need more kids like Phillips and Rousseau. That's recruiting and evals. If you're right about our development being great then recruiting will be the solution so we can develop kids with NFL upsides.
I did like Rousseau, btw. Not so much when we first took his commitment (pre-summer IIRC), but a lot by his senior year when I saw more. But he's just that guy. He is bigger and has the frame. For the record, I'd take him over Phillips if I'm an NFL GM. Not sure what it even means to say we 'developed' him. Did we teach him tons of technique? He had the body, hit the weights, and in game time made plays. I hope to **** you're right and we're special at developing kids, but the overall body of our work the past two decades tells me we're not. When we get the right kids, they progress. When we don't, they don't.