Goldens didn't win the Coastal
just to clarify...my posts aren't any indictment on golden. just dismissing his retarded points of view. the only point i agree with him about is that so far we can't really judge muschamp at uf...but if that's his logic then he needs to apply the same to golden. if you can't judge either yet and the past doesn't matter (his words) then i don't know what the **** he's using as a basis to judge either coach. but he can easily pick one over the other lol. but as we've seen the dude can stay consistent from sentence to sentence much less post to post.
The problem is you're not following along. I never said the past doesn't matter. I said his success as a DC is irrelevant to how he's to be judged as a HC.. I cited Shannon as an example of where that line of thinking can lead. Golden on the other hand was previously SUCCESSFUL as a HC. It would be silly to not use it to compare. But whatever.
ANyhow, appreciate you at least trying to support your stance. So let's just agree to disagree.
At the very least the coaching edge is debatable, which I think is what end goal should be on message boards.
Lastly, I'll leave you with this.
http://athlonsports.com/college-football/ranking-all-125-college-football-head-coaches-2013
19.Golden
36. Muschamp
37. Fisher
http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-fo...ankings-2013-nick-saban-urban-meyer-les-miles
24.Muschamp
26.Fisher
32.Golden
just showing there is support for both sides.