For fūcks sake, Christ almighty, give it a fūcking break. I actually had to look this up to shut your bltch mouth up.
Only 18% of FBS teams had a freshman as their leading rusher, how many of those were true freshman i.e. first year players like Citizen, versus second year, or red shirt freshman I don’t know. I’ll let you figure that out.
Will you finally shut the fūck up and stop the derail. I’ve already spent 10 minutes on this today, that’s 10 minutes I can never get back, and you ended up being wrong anyway.
NCAA College Football FBS current individual Stats | NCAA.com
Discover the current NCAA FBS Football leaders in every stats category, as well as historic leaders.www.ncaa.com
Congrats - you just proved the point I already agreed with you about So I should shut my ***** mouth up....because I'm agreeing with you?
I said - "If you said of the 120+ RB's that will be Freshman this year - a small % will play "a ton" this year, then you're absolutely correct." The data proves the point we both agree on. Even so - given 18% led their team in rushing, let's say another 12% played "a ton" (but didn't lead the team), is 30% really a small % (as I said), or "extremely uncommon" (as you said)? Probably not. We might both be wrong here.
You saying "great RB's playing right away is extremely uncommon" remains false. The data shows it's false. You can't give any data or even explain what you mean by your statement to even begin to try and prove otherwise. Until you can do either - I'll remain confused why you continue to fight this.