"The Process"

QuadCityCane

Redshirt Freshman
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
226
So I've always been a big picture kind of guy so after a few ****ed off days I got to thinking. Before the year started Al and D decide to install the 3-4 2 gap defense they would like to run at Miami even though they dont quite have the right horses for the job. What this will do is give the kids who they are building the program around valuable experience in the system (pierre, howard, gunter, jenkins, bush, crawford, TC, kirby, grace, etc) So they have the kids bulk up along the line and at linebacker to hopefully do the job. No one in their right mind thinks before the year we are in the hunt for a National Title. 8-4 to 10-2 were most expectations. Just some improvement and developing of the young talent.
Fast forward to 7-0, expectations are then getting out of control, in the media and by fans. Golden says "No the U isnt back, we are building." Defense played pretty good against the teams through about the first 6 or 7 games. Once we started playing decent teams the same problems that we had last year start again, poor tackling, line getting pushed back, no TOs(big one), and no pressure(another big one). So what do we do? Stay the course or abandon ship?

I say stay the course, why you ask? Cause I'm nuts right? Well this is why.

From 2001 to 2004, the Cavaliers' defense improved under his tutelage, ranking 108th in total defense in his first year to ranking 18th in total defense in 2004. In the same time period, Virginia's scoring defense went from 74th in the nation (27.6 ppg) to 17th (17.7 ppg) utilizing Golden's 3–4 defense.
And
Temple went from last in Golden's first year to 17th scoring D and gave up 317.7 ypg in 2010.
Why is any of this important you ask? Well let's take a look at Temple's 2010 defensive players compared to Miami's current players at key positions. We will look at 3 areas that are the most important. D-line, Middle Linebacker, and Strong Safety.

Temple 2010 D
Muhammad Wilkerson DT/DE 70 tackles, 13.5 TFL and 9.5 sacks----1st round/30th pick overall
Elijah Joseph MLB 71 tackles, 5.5 TFL, 1 sack, 1 FF, 1 INT, 7 PD----Free Agent pick up
Jaiquawn Jarrett SS 74 tackles, 2 TFL, 2 INT, 1 FF, 4 PD----2nd round/54th pick overall
The rest of the players on Temple's team had average/below average stats.

Miami 2013 D
Porter/Pierre/Renfrow/Robinson DT 91 total tackles, 4.5 TFL, and 1 sack----Late rounds/Free agent at best
Green DE 57 tackles, 10.5 TFL, and 3 sacks----Late round possibility, but injury concerns
Chick DE 40 tackles, 7 TFL, and 3.5 sacks----Mid/Late round if he bulks up or slims down but at current weight Late Round/Free Agent
Kamalu/Gilbert/Muhammad/Mccord DE 27 total tackles, 9 TFL, and 8 sacks----Good young talent, young but still learning the scheme(minus senior Gilbert)
Jimmy Gaines MLB 64 tackles, 1 TFL, 0 sacks, 1 FF, 2 INT, 0 PD----Free Agent, NFL Europe
AJ Highsmith SS 19 tackles, 1 TFL, 1 INT, 0 FF, 2 PD----Coach? cause thats his only shot
Deon Bush SS 19 tackles, 1 TFL, 1 INT, 1 FF, 0 PD----Good young talent, injury recovery hampered his play

The difference?
One team has 2 first day picks at 2 of the most important positions in a 3-4 D. A lineman who commands double teams and a sure tackling safety. Wilkerson played mostly DT but slid all along the line. Why is it that our 4 DTs only have 20 more tackles and have 9 less TFL, and 8.5 less sacks as a unit. Green is good against the run which is shown by his tackles and tackles for loss but he is not a pash rusher. Chick either needs to gain 20 more pounds and move inside or shed some weight and regain his speed. He is basically a carbon copy of Green because he also cant rush the passer. Until we get a real NT and some players who are a threat to rush the passer as every down lineman we wont be very good. Add the fact our SS play has been absolutely terrible. I mean the fact that AJ Highsmith has played the majority of the snaps this year and has 19 total tackles is horrible. That is one of the biggest reasons our run defense is so poor. He is not a sure tackler and takes very bad angles. I will give Bush a pass cause he is hampered by the hernia but he has the same amount of tackles as Highsmith in about 1/3 of the playing time.

The solution?
The 1st recruiting class was basically non existant due to Shannon and the NCAA. The second was filled with some great young building blocks but also some reaches due to the NCAA cloud. This is the first class free of any Cloud and we are looking at a top 5 class for sure. Stay the course. Keep this d-line recruiting class together and add Pelon/Boateng/Johnson. The linebacker recruits are stellar. We do need to add a Safety for depth.

After 10 years of mediocrity and hopelessness with Coker and Shannon, I'm just not ready to burn the house down yet. I can actually see the light at the end of the tunnel. It took Schnelly 5 years to win a title and Davis took 6 + 1 Coker year. The reality is this project is somewhere between a rebuild (Schnelly) and a NCAA scandal (Davis). I dont really care about Coastal divisions or ACC Championship games. Davis had a banner, got blown out by UCLA and Syracuse, and was considered a suspect gameday coach and adjuster*. Everyone wanted to run him out of town. Guess what, yes it took a little longer than us as fans would like, but he assembled the pieces to the greatest college football team ever.

National Titles-That is what Miami is about.


*Bill Miller was fired by Butch---he then went on to be Sabans DC at Michigan State and had the best D in the Big 10. 2005-06 he took ASU's defense from last in the Pac 10 to 2nd behind USC. He was a semifinalst for the Broyles Award, which is presented annually to college football's Assistant Coach of the Year, while at Michigan State (2000) and Florida (2003). Was he a horrible coach or could the fact that -30 scholarships hurt the talent and depth to run a decent defense?
 
Advertisement
Nice response. You don't change a long term plan for short term results to the detriment of the long term goal. Yes the coaches made mistakes playing a style of D that is not suited to the current D line and LB strengths but the young players that will be here when we are good enough to actually contend for National Titles will now have experience.
 
I happen to agree with much of post. Much of the whining about the D on the board refuses to acknowledge the complete lack of playmakers on the D side as result of the horrendous state of the recruiting when Shannon left. Goldens timing couldnt have been worse considering the NCAA debacle and comsidering the disruption it created in trying to fill critical positions on the already depleated D freshman class.

However, the absolute unwilliimgmess to make necessary adjustments in games in spite of gigantic failure after failure is beyond baffling and does not lend confidence. The only way i can explain it is if Golden, in exchange for his staying on board and his dozens of hours of time I know he spent with the Ad and the President working through the NCAA mess...got their agreement to stay out of they way as the pressure builds while he imposes his system over time...knowing it would be a clusterfark for a few years.
 
Advertisement
I happen to agree with much of post. Much of the whining about the D on the board refuses to acknowledge the complete lack of playmakers on the D side as result of the horrendous state of the recruiting when Shannon left. Goldens timing couldnt have been worse considering the NCAA debacle and comsidering the disruption it created in trying to fill critical positions on the already depleted D freshman class.

However, the absolute unwilliimgmess to make necessary adjustments in games in spite of gigantic failure after failure is beyond baffling and does not lend confidence. The only way i can explain it is if Golden, in exchange for his staying on board and his dozens of hours of time I know he spent with the Ad and the President working through the NCAA mess...got their agreement to stay out of they way as the pressure builds while he imposes his system over time...knowing it would be a clusterfark for a few years.

If the goal was to win as many games as possible this year, they would have run a ball control offense and stayed with the 4-3 defense. Eventually you have to implement your system that you want on offense and defense. They have made adjustments but the key positions for the defense arent good enough to make a difference.

"The nose tackle and the inside linebackers, those are three guys that are very important. But when you go through it, the nose tackle is probably the single-most important guy. ”

—Joe Collier, Denver Broncos assistant (1969–1988), architect of the "Orange Crush Defense".
We have 3rd string castoff Justin Renfrow as the NT. Add a bulked up Curtis Porter who is better suited to 4-3.

"If you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4.”

—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.

We have 1 good linebacker.

In a 3-4 defense, the strong safety is usually larger than the free safety and is positioned relatively close to the line of scrimmage. He is often an integral part of the run defense, but is also responsible for defending against a pass; especially against passes to the tight-ends.

AJ has played 75% of the snaps and has 7 solos tackles and 19 Total tackles. He should have that many against GT and Duke with 90+ attempts and 600+ total rushing yards.

Bottom line is if you are building for the future you have to implement what you want on offense and defense and take the bumps in the road along the way.
 
People are ****ed because we were handed two slam dunk opportunities to win the Coastal this year and just handed both away. One to a 100+ ranked offense who managed to put up 500+ yards and mostly score at will and the other to a bottom-dweller of the ACC who's offense was held to fewer points by NCST, Virginia, Navy, GT, Memphis, Troy....their entire **** schedule except Pitt. I don't doubt that some of those teams namely VT has more defensive talent but I'm not buying into Navy, Troy, or Memphis being more talented at any single position let alone the entire defense.
 
[]_[]Fan2010;1684835 said:
People are ****ed because we were handed two slam dunk opportunities to win the Coastal this year and just handed both away. One to a 100+ ranked offense who managed to put up 500+ yards and mostly score at will and the other to a bottom-dweller of the ACC who's offense was held to fewer points by NCST, Virginia, Navy, GT, Memphis, Troy....their entire **** schedule except Pitt. I don't doubt that some of those teams namely VT has more defensive talent but I'm not buying into Navy, Troy, or Memphis being more talented at any single position let alone the entire defense.

See you let your emotions get in the way of rational thoughts. Duke is not a bottom dweller anymore with Cutcliffe. They are 8-2 and winning the coastal. Like I said if they wanted to win as many games as possible this year they would have ran a ball control offense and stayed a 4-3. This is about big picture and they are not going to change the scheme in the middle of the year cause we got blown out.
 
Fast forward to 7-0, expectations are then getting out of control, in the media and by fans. Golden says "No the U isnt back, we are building."

This has been the problem. But still, teams have found weaknesses in this defense and they haven't been resolved. This process is going to be a long one.
 
Advertisement
Big problem is that Golden isn't some defensive mastermind. All I'm seeing from Dorito and Golden is they need a perfect set of circumstances to field a solid defense. At Temple and Virginia you have a lot more time to build a defense. At Miami you can't **** away seasons waiting for the perfect storm of players and talent.

Golden has been a DC or HC for 13 years now. Hes been apart of 5 top 50 defenses and of those only 2 times has he fielded a top 30 defense. Both places he left Temple and Virginia were statistically better the next season.

If history is any indication we should field a top 30 defense in a couple years. I guess we have that to look forward to.
 
Fast forward to 7-0, expectations are then getting out of control, in the media and by fans. Golden says "No the U isnt back, we are building."

This has been the problem. But still, teams have found weaknesses in this defense and they haven't been resolved. This process is going to be a long one.

The weaknesses were there even against Florida, GT, NC and Wake. Difference is when a play needed to be made it was. VT and Duke we got 0 TOs, no pressure, no plays on 3rd down and couldnt tackle. And then we lost.
 
You play to win the game. You don't sacrifice an entire season because you're trying to acclimate a bunch of seniors, who won't be here next year, to the 3-4 even though you don't think you have the horses to run that scheme. That's just retarded, and if that's what they're doing, then they should all stab each other to death as soon as possible.

If your goal is to transition to the 3-4, but you don't have the horses to run it (which I think is a horseshyt argument to begin with), then don't install it until you have those horses. Until then, you run what your personnel does best. That's the sign of good football coaching. You put the players you have in the best position to be successful; you don't try to force them into doing something they're ill-equipped to do.
 
You play to win the game. You don't sacrifice an entire season because you're trying to acclimate a bunch of seniors, who won't be here next year, to the 3-4 even though you don't think you have the horses to run that scheme. That's just retarded, and if that's what they're doing, then they should all stab each other to death as soon as possible.

If your goal is to transition to the 3-4, but you don't have the horses to run it (which I think is a horseshyt argument to begin with), then don't install it until you have those horses. Until then, you run what your personnel does best. That's the sign of good football coaching. You put the players you have in the best position to be successful; you don't try to force them into doing something they're ill-equipped to do.

Amen! That is coaching 101 and the coaches who don't follow those principles don't coach for very long at the upper levels of football.
 
Advertisement
So Golden just needs 5 years, more talent than the opponent and a senior laden squad to field a successful defense,

sounds legit
 
This system is not as hard to learn as the results may show. It's basically intended to shut down opponent passing games or make them pay with interceptions. Without the horses, it's a joke. There are tons of big cornfed linemen in Pennsylvania. In S. Fl linemen are faster but not as big. The result is a bunch of guys bred to sack. Build a defense around pressuring the QB and Golden will get results.
 
Advertisement
You don't sacrifice an entire season because you're trying to acclimate a bunch of seniors, who won't be here next year, to the 3-4 even though you don't think you have the horses to run that scheme.

That's not what the OP is suggesting. Read sentence #3 again.
 
The problem with this system is how fragile it is in terms of its dependency on very specific kinds of players who are capable of playing within all of its intricacies.

I don't think Golden ever imagined the defense would be this bad. If the progress continues to be this slow (and it could be argued that we haven't made any this year), it has the very real potential of inhibiting our ability to improve next season. When you consider the unknowns on offense (freshman QB in particular but also losing some important OL pieces), will we be able to lean on this defense next season?

I think Golden probably felt in 2012 that by 2014 we could, but at this pace of development we have every reason to doubt it.
 
Yawn. Get these defensive coaches out of my face.

Year 3 and it's the same BS. No one on defense is buying into this style of play. You can tell.

And how retarded do you have to be to take So Fla talent and make them read and react vs just react.

I can't stand these Joe Pa scrubs.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top