Targeting

Advertisement
Rule was established in an attempt to protect players from themselves. The safety ducks his head & is fortunate to walk away. Don’t care about specifics of the rule - 6 inch circle of helmet crown (ok, who is measuring?) - but ducking the head like that is recipe for disaster.
 
The point everyone is missing is that somehow the star of the game for GA was a white walk-on safety who was an absolute animal all game, targeting aside.
 
Dude literally looked like Naruto trying to tackle king. Crown first with no use of his arms hitting king in his facemask.
 
Is anyone going to care that the fumble against Georgia tech was targeting but since it wasn't miami they don't care it wasn't a missed called. The broadcasting crew didn't even bring it up. I'm fine with it but if you are going to penalize miami for a miami for a supposed missed call, you better penalize georgia for a worse penalty.
Same exact tackle but Moten hits harder so it got called targeting. Worst rule in sports.
 
Advertisement
The point everyone is missing is that somehow the star of the game for GA was a white walk-on safety who was an absolute animal all game, targeting aside.
Awkward Dance GIF by MOODMAN
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
First off get rid of the rule.... Second. Through the years I have seen hits in SEC games that are old school hits. Hits we all love that are def targeting that arent called. Its almost as if the sec gets a second set of rules.

Then I have seen the weakest of targeting calls in other confrences
 
No problem with the no call. I get why the rules in place but a helmet clipping a little bit of the facemask shouldnt decide the game. It's ridiculous

Would they call it if the rolls were reversed is another story though
 
Advertisement
Seems to be confusion as to the exact rule these days so I went and read it. It's targeting if you lead with the crown of your helmet (obviously happens here) as long as there is one indicator. Indicators include: lowering your head before making contact (that happens here) or contact to head/neck area (also happens here). So targeting is satisfied two different ways. This is actually so text book they could use it in the offseason as a teaching example.

My problem is twofold: 1. The selective enforcement of the rule and 2. The illegal hit is why he fumbled. King dropped the ball because he got speared in the face. If the guy makes a tackle how our guys are taught every day in practice to make a tackle, the fumble probably doesn't happen.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top