Banks:
privatize profits
subsidize loses
less oversight
Banks:
privatize profits
subsidize loses
less oversight
Banks:
privatize profits
subsidize loses
less oversight
FedNow to the rescue!On a macro basis, banks are no longer a good business, which is worrisome for the future. "Non banks" have entered a lot of the profitable businesses that banks used to have, so banks are left with lots of employees, real estate, oversight, low margin businesses, etc etc.
FIFYFedNow to the rescue!
100% agree. Banking is Devolving by the day.
just wait 3-6 monthsBest thread going..
![]()
![]()
Peter Thiel said he had $50 million in a personal account at Silicon Valley Bank when it collapsed, despite telling his portfolio companies to pull their money
Some have blamed Thiel for helping to trigger the run on SVB after he told Founders Fund customers to pull deposits from the bank before its collapse.www.businessinsider.com
Let's be honest. That article isn't for people who know anyone at a PE company.I can tell you that EVERY PE company I am familiar with pulled their deposits from FR, so that article is BS.
Let's be honest. That article isn't for people who know anyone at a PE company.
Hard to read some of the quotes. While the 1800s and early 1900s didn't have massive losses, they also didn't have the USD as the global reserve currency. The USA is also a massive country with tons of interconnected "parts" not just within the country but around the world. Thus, I'm ok with having a central bank but I'm not a fan of how connected they've become with the treasury.![]()
What Gets Lost When You Rescue Markets
Throwing a lifeline to the financial system in times of crisis can have unintended consequences. Among them: Making the world feel safer can lull people into complacency and excessive risk-taking.www.wsj.com
what would happen if the FED pivoted on rates but ramped up on reducing their balance sheet ?