Staff may just go all in with Emory now…

The reality is that Emory didn’t ever looked decent even in those Clemson and FSU games that his groupies bragged about until last saturday.

He has all the flaws (slow, statue, noodle arm) that are lethal for a modern QB, I’d suggest him to hop into a DeLorean and go back in the 70s.
 
Advertisement
Aren't there VR tools now that can give any QB quasi "1st team reps" against the toughest D scenarios?

@Lance Roffers

Granted sims are not real life, but should give some indication on where each QB is at.
You know coaches are going to be partial to players they recruit. I don't begrudge them that at all.

But after what we saw from Emory (which was simply not D1 level play), there is no way I'm going into year four with even a chance that I'm relying on Judd Anderson to ever play here. If he takes it because of his play, I can handle that.

With portal free agency allowing any team to go get anything they want at any time by simply paying money, I cannot imagine thinking I'm developing three star QB's as my future. You let someone else do that and then buy the ones that pop.

I'm frankly scared that Miami coaches aren't being honest with themselves (or me) after watching Emory play. This QB room, as it currently stands, is what place in the ACC? Who would you have behind it?

You're losing the best player in football. Three RB's. All your WR's that played. Need a new DC. Half a new defense.

And you're going to go into next season with even a chance that you have to rely on Emory or Judd?

Whew. Couldn't be me.
 
You know coaches are going to be partial to players they recruit. I don't begrudge them that at all.

But after what we saw from Emory (which was simply not D1 level play), there is no way I'm going into year four with even a chance that I'm relying on Judd Anderson to ever play here. If he takes it because of his play, I can handle that.

With portal free agency allowing any team to go get anything they want at any time by simply paying money, I cannot imagine thinking I'm developing three star QB's as my future. You let someone else do that and then buy the ones that pop.

I'm frankly scared that Miami coaches aren't being honest with themselves (or me) after watching Emory play. This QB room, as it currently stands, is what place in the ACC? Who would you have behind it?

You're losing the best player in football. Three RB's. All your WR's that played. Need a new DC. Half a new defense.

And you're going to go into next season with even a chance that you have to rely on Emory or Judd?

Whew. Couldn't be me.
Excellent points.

However...isn't there a VR system that is very advanced that gives strong simulation on a given QBs keys?

I would think a program like Miami would have access to this kit...

Yes/no?


How is Emory this bad and staff doesn't know? Goodness huge fail.
 
Excellent points.

However...isn't there a VR system that is very advanced that gives strong simulation on a given QBs keys?

I would think a program like Miami would have access to this kit...

Yes/no?


How is Emory this bad and staff doesn't know? Goodness huge fail.
I've been pounding the VR drum for years and gotten deaf ears.

To my knowledge, they aren't relying on this to help develop their QB's at this time.

If it were me, my QB's would all be getting thousands of reps with VR. I'd have more than one available so that my guys are always having chances and I'd track their usage with profile log-ins.

You can set these up to mirror defenses that you load and have them prep and grow on anything they desire.

We are spending tens of millions on recruiting, but I would lop off a milly and spend it on tech to develop these guys.

I know there are people around the program pushing for more data, tech, analytics usage in the program. Not sure what has or will come from that yet.
 
I've been pounding the VR drum for years and gotten deaf ears.

To my knowledge, they aren't relying on this to help develop their QB's at this time.

If it were me, my QB's would all be getting thousands of reps with VR. I'd have more than one available so that my guys are always having chances and I'd track their usage with profile log-ins.

You can set these up to mirror defenses that you load and have them prep and grow on anything they desire.

We are spending tens of millions on recruiting, but I would lop off a milly and spend it on tech to develop these guys.

I know there are people around the program pushing for more data, tech, analytics usage in the program. Not sure what has or will come from that yet.
We’ve had a new VR machine it’s just Mario and Feld can’t figure out how to access it….


ben stiller GIF
 
Advertisement
Excellent points.

However...isn't there a VR system that is very advanced that gives strong simulation on a given QBs keys?

I would think a program like Miami would have access to this kit...

Yes/no?


How is Emory this bad and staff doesn't know? Goodness huge fail.

Coley was ahead of his time using Google glasses in practice over 10 years ago.
 
You know coaches are going to be partial to players they recruit. I don't begrudge them that at all.

But after what we saw from Emory (which was simply not D1 level play), there is no way I'm going into year four with even a chance that I'm relying on Judd Anderson to ever play here. If he takes it because of his play, I can handle that.

With portal free agency allowing any team to go get anything they want at any time by simply paying money, I cannot imagine thinking I'm developing three star QB's as my future. You let someone else do that and then buy the ones that pop.

I'm frankly scared that Miami coaches aren't being honest with themselves (or me) after watching Emory play. This QB room, as it currently stands, is what place in the ACC? Who would you have behind it?

You're losing the best player in football. Three RB's. All your WR's that played. Need a new DC. Half a new defense.

And you're going to go into next season with even a chance that you have to rely on Emory or Judd?

Whew. Couldn't be me.
I would say there's zero percent chance any QB on the roster today will be the starter in 2025.
 
You know coaches are going to be partial to players they recruit. I don't begrudge them that at all.

But after what we saw from Emory (which was simply not D1 level play), there is no way I'm going into year four with even a chance that I'm relying on Judd Anderson to ever play here. If he takes it because of his play, I can handle that.

With portal free agency allowing any team to go get anything they want at any time by simply paying money, I cannot imagine thinking I'm developing three star QB's as my future. You let someone else do that and then buy the ones that pop.

I'm frankly scared that Miami coaches aren't being honest with themselves (or me) after watching Emory play. This QB room, as it currently stands, is what place in the ACC? Who would you have behind it?

You're losing the best player in football. Three RB's. All your WR's that played. Need a new DC. Half a new defense.

And you're going to go into next season with even a chance that you have to rely on Emory or Judd?

Whew. Couldn't be me.
I mean at this point, milroe?
 
Advertisement
I imagine tomorrow (5th day since our bowl game) will be a big day on the transfer portal front for our players - I don't hope emory goes, but would at least signal we've had the conversation we're looking

or is it 5 business days after a bowl game? thought it was just 5 flat days
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top