Since 2009 vs UF and FSU tells the story

In nine years, Miami has not beaten an equal or better seed.

And it means absolutely squat.

A team can win a national championship and not play an "equal or better seed" the entire time. In fact it's come close to happening at least twice.

But nobody can tell you which one because rational don't care. It's about beating the team in front of you and advancing.

This fabricated standard that you've erected is only relevant to serial whiners like you and tcgrad.

The post-season "means squat" because Morris' ten year post-season record is indefensible. You can't defend it, therefore you pass it off as meaningless.

The University of Miami has ....one single win.... in Omaha in the past nine seasons. Indefensible. But you're going to be there to carry him out on your shoulders next May.
 
Advertisement
The University of Miami has ....one single win.... in Omaha in the past nine seasons. Indefensible. But you're going to be there to carry him out on your shoulders next May.

You manufacture statistics, and standards, that nobody else uses because you just can't help but denigrate World Series appearances.
 
Advertisement
Then we finally agree that Jim Morris' ten year post-season stretch is deplorable given the expectations for Miami baseball.

One of the reasons the expectations are what they are is because of Jim Morris.

And not just because of a decade or more ago. But because of recently.
 
The University of Miami has ....one single win.... in Omaha in the past nine seasons. Indefensible. But you're going to be there to carry him out on your shoulders next May.

You manufacture statistics, and standards, that nobody else uses because you just can't help but denigrate World Series appearances.

No one else cares about wins in Omaha? Maybe that's why you and Jim Morris seem to be on the same page.
 
Advertisement
Miami baseball 1994-2004 vs. Miami baseball 2005-2017 (or 1994-2008 vs. 2009-2017). There's no comparison. What's happened the last 10-15 years is not and should not be acceptable for what Fraser built starting in the early 70s and Morris solidified in the 90s and early 00s. I'm not sure why anyone is defending him at this point. He had a great run. It's over. Move on. Simple.

I love when people who don't follow the program chime in.

When we were winning 50 games and going to Omaha in back-to-back seasons the same people were saying that Morris was washed up.

They don't have a standard. They just whine year after year and wait for a moment when they can claim to be right. But as we've all seen, if what you value is being "right" then you can always win. It's just a matter of time.

I don't follow the program? Ok. You have 41 posts. Or, is that because you keep getting banned and coming back with a different name?
 
Then we finally agree that Jim Morris' ten year post-season stretch is deplorable given the expectations for Miami baseball.

One of the reasons the expectations are what they are is because of Jim Morris.

And not just because of a decade or more ago. But because of recently.

How many home regionals had we lost before Jim Morris' recent stretch?
What was our longest Omaha drought before Jim Morris' recent stretch?

Jim Morris set the standard from 1995-2008. Undeniable. 2009-2017 has been a mess.
 
I don't follow the program? Ok. You have 41 posts. Or, is that because you keep getting banned and coming back with a different name?

No. You don't.

You don't know basketball either even though you pretend to.

We all know about how you started on canestime and had 16,000 posts in your first 4 months. Not a single one of them was insightful or interesting either.
 
Advertisement
Or, is that because you keep getting banned and coming back with a different name?

Yeah, I have balls.

I'm not afraid to tell moderators that they're clueless. Then those "tough guys" ban me. That's how they respond to someone who knows more about the topic then they do.
 
No one else cares about wins in Omaha? Maybe that's why you and Jim Morris seem to be on the same page.

Sorry.

I was referring to your completely made up "wins vs. equal or better seeds" statistic.

It's not a made up stat. It is verifiable. And it is proof that our program has been built for regular season success.

You can defend him all you want. It's admirable. But don't be disingenuous and claim that never beating a #1 seed in nine years isn't a red flag. Those are the best teams in the field, and we can't beat them, ever.
 
How many home regionals had we lost before Jim Morris' recent stretch?

Fraser lost two (1977, 1990) and Morris lost two (2012, 2014).

Fraser went 9-2 in home regionals. Morris went 12-2.

So you managed to prove that Morris has a better postseason record than a legend.

Congrats.
 
Advertisement
I don't follow the program? Ok. You have 41 posts. Or, is that because you keep getting banned and coming back with a different name?

No. You don't.

You don't know basketball either even though you pretend to.

We all know about how you started on canestime and had 16,000 posts in your first 4 months. Not a single one of them was insightful or interesting either.

Ok buddy, whatever makes you feel better about yourself, stat boy. It's impossible to get 16K posts in 4 months, by the way. I don't think I had 16K by the time I left Grassy, but go ahead, if it makes you feel better. I did post a lot, and racked up most of those posts during in game basketball posts. But, again, push whatever makes you feel better about yourself.
 
How many home regionals had we lost before Jim Morris' recent stretch?

Fraser lost two (1977, 1990) and Morris lost two (2012, 2014).

Fraser went 9-2 in home regionals. Morris went 12-2.

So you managed to prove that Morris has a better postseason record than a legend.

Congrats.

Talk about missing the point. This is about Morris' RECENT performance. You're better than that.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top