We all know what's about to happen here. It's like clockwork at this point:
(1) I'm going to destroy your post.
(2) You're going to disappear for three days.
(3) You will come back with more insults and ignore the fact that I destroyed this post.
A 60-game season is statistically significant. If we are top-8 during a 60-game season, we SHOULD face lower seeds because we earned the privilege.
Who said we shouldn't face lower seeds? At some point, champions play equal or better seeds. At the beginning of next season, Miami will have gone ten years without beating an equal or higher seed in the post-season. Ten years. A full decade without a win over a
#1 seed.
A 3-game series to Dartmouth during the second week of the season is meaningless.
Right, except for the fact that it is literally THE series that kept us out of the post-season. And I'm not sure how much baseball you've watched, but getting shut out twice by Dartmouth isn't meaningless. It means you suck as an offense.
Morris failed this year badly
Groundbreaking.
OF COURSE he played BC and VCW.... His team EARNED that right.
His teams also earned the right to play other
#1 seeds. For ten years. And we couldn't beat one of them. Not one.
I look at 2013-2016, and it is mathematically obvious that Morris "righted the ship" and made us elite once again. Being a top-8 seed for two consecutive years, AND making Omaha, is highly statistically significant.
You wouldn't know "statistically significant" if it walked up and punched you in the mouth. You're just about the worst numbers guy I've ever seen. Morris' improved record against a woefully overrated ACC is far from significant. One thing didn't change: his inability to beat other
#1 seeds in the post-season. That hasn't changed one bit.
The gnome picks and chooses data. He does not utilize an unbiased data-set because he possesses rudimentary knowledge in the field. There is no point in arguing until the detractors take several classes on probability and discreet mathematics (or Morris fails again next year). Based on Morris' track record, I think that he will excel next year, but that is an opinion.
Quit trying to act like a professor. You have no idea how to apply math, probability, or statistics to any of this. If you did, you would know to stay far, far away because the data proves that Jim Morris has been coasting for ten years.
Goodbye until your next immature, insult-filled post.