Shawn Davis

[miamilos]

You preffer a fast guy that can't catch the ball. 40 time is overrated

 

[Canesfan1899]

You preffer a fast guy that can't catch the ball. 40 time is overrated

He doesn't need to be Philip Dorsett fast but a 4.99 forty isn't going to cut it.

 

[The Franchise]

Why is his offer list good then?

There's no way to verify offers.

 

[ILCane2011]

People on here do realize Rodney Scott runs Track, right?

He's not a burner, obviously, but he has run a 15.6 110m hurdles this year. It is literally impossible to run a 4.99 40 and have a verified track time like that.

Before people freak out over 1 40 from 1 event, maybe just consider that he had (1) he had a bad run, (2), it's a typo, or (3) there was a clock issue.

Any one of those makes 99% more sense than a 4-star WR running a 5 second 40. But hey, people love to hate on kids when they can here

 

[pimpcane1]

People on here do realize Rodney Scott runs Track, right?

He's not a burner, obviously, but he has run a 15.6 110m hurdles this year. It is literally impossible to run a 4.99 40 and have a verified track time like that.

Before people freak out over 1 40 from 1 event, maybe just consider that he had (1) he had a bad run, (2), it's a typo, or (3) there was a clock issue.

Any one of those makes 99% more sense than a 4-star WR running a 5 second 40. But hey, people love to hate on kids when they can here

People aren't freaking out only about 1 40.

Slow on tape + 166 lbs+ 5.0 40=people freaking out

I don't know many slow possession type WR that weigh 166 lbs, that alone would have me concerned.

 

[ILCane2011]

People on here do realize Rodney Scott runs Track, right?

He's not a burner, obviously, but he has run a 15.6 110m hurdles this year. It is literally impossible to run a 4.99 40 and have a verified track time like that.

Before people freak out over 1 40 from 1 event, maybe just consider that he had (1) he had a bad run, (2), it's a typo, or (3) there was a clock issue.

Any one of those makes 99% more sense than a 4-star WR running a 5 second 40. But hey, people love to hate on kids when they can here

People aren't freaking out only about 1 40.

Slow on tape + 166 lbs+ 5.0 40=people freaking out

I don't know many slow possession type WR that weigh 166 lbs, that alone would have me concerned.

I give up, you can't rationalize with posters like this.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO CONSISTENTLY RUN A 5.0 40. AGAIN, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE.

Track times at major meets are verified. Scott has run AT LEAST 4 sub-16 110m hurdles. You can't have both times, the human body doesn't work that way.

We really do have some ridiculously dumb "fans"

 

[valid]

15.6 in 110m is an average time....that's similar to running 12 seconds in 100m. a non athlete that casually works out,such as myself, can probably pull that off.

 

[pimpcane1]

People on here do realize Rodney Scott runs Track, right?

He's not a burner, obviously, but he has run a 15.6 110m hurdles this year. It is literally impossible to run a 4.99 40 and have a verified track time like that.

Before people freak out over 1 40 from 1 event, maybe just consider that he had (1) he had a bad run, (2), it's a typo, or (3) there was a clock issue.

Any one of those makes 99% more sense than a 4-star WR running a 5 second 40. But hey, people love to hate on kids when they can here

People aren't freaking out only about 1 40.

Slow on tape + 166 lbs+ 5.0 40=people freaking out

I don't know many slow possession type WR that weigh 166 lbs, that alone would have me concerned.

I give up, you can't rationalize with posters like this.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO CONSISTENTLY RUN A 5.0 40. AGAIN, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE.

Track times at major meets are verified. Scott has run AT LEAST 4 sub-16 110m hurdles. You can't have both times, the human body doesn't work that way.

We really do have some ridiculously dumb "fans"

Look numb nuts I'm going to go easy on you because your new to this site. You yourself said he isn't a burner so tell me other non burners that weigh 166 lbs that have been productive in college football?

Moreover, using a sub-16 sec 110m hurdle as an indicator for speed is dumb, see valids post.

 

[nystateofmind]

I think the staff should just drop a consensus 4 star WR based off the opinions of some message board posters.

 

[Zbrod95]

I think the staff should just drop a consensus 4 star WR based off the opinions of some message board posters.

yup because if we coached the hurricanes all th SFL kids would stay and we would make them all superstars

 

[miamilos]

People on here do realize Rodney Scott runs Track, right?

He's not a burner, obviously, but he has run a 15.6 110m hurdles this year. It is literally impossible to run a 4.99 40 and have a verified track time like that.

Before people freak out over 1 40 from 1 event, maybe just consider that he had (1) he had a bad run, (2), it's a typo, or (3) there was a clock issue.

Any one of those makes 99% more sense than a 4-star WR running a 5 second 40. But hey, people love to hate on kids when they can here

People aren't freaking out only about 1 40.

Slow on tape + 166 lbs+ 5.0 40=people freaking out

I don't know many slow possession type WR that weigh 166 lbs, that alone would have me concerned.

People are freaking out? You are freaking out! Speak for yourself and get over the 40 time.
We get commitments from big time recruits and people find ways to critize. Ridiculous

 

[Dwinstitles]

I think the staff should just drop a consensus 4 star WR based off the opinions of some message board posters.

Here u guys go again defending the staff blindly when dudes 40 isnt good. We have a right to question it period theres no 4.99 wrs in the nfl

 

[losdogcane]

I think the staff should just drop a consensus 4 star WR based off the opinions of some message board posters.

Here u guys go again defending the staff blindly when dudes 40 isnt good. We have a right to question it period theres no 4.99 wrs in the nfl

This isn't the NFL.

 

[miamilos]

Guys, do you know this guy was offered by big time programs. Do you think Nick Saban, Mark Richt etc... Are going to offer a kid that they think cannot contribute. These people make millions of dollars to do this. Do you realize that?

 

[brock]

You can take the b*tchness out of miami( golden and co) but it's seems the b*tchness is still in the fans. Miami fans complain about everything, I thought that would change once we got a high profile coach but I was definitely wrong about that lol.....

 

[Dwinstitles]

You can take the b*tchness out of miami( golden and co) but it's seems the b*tchness is still in the fans. Miami fans complain about everything, I thought that would change once we got a high profile coach but I was definitely wrong about that lol.....

U thought ag was high profile.....we can question any offer we want its a forum based on opinions. We question some of AGs offers and we were right and you guus were blind. If we question one of MR offers so be it

 

[Canesfan1899]

People on here do realize Rodney Scott runs Track, right?

He's not a burner, obviously, but he has run a 15.6 110m hurdles this year. It is literally impossible to run a 4.99 40 and have a verified track time like that.

Before people freak out over 1 40 from 1 event, maybe just consider that he had (1) he had a bad run, (2), it's a typo, or (3) there was a clock issue.

Any one of those makes 99% more sense than a 4-star WR running a 5 second 40. But hey, people love to hate on kids when they can here

People aren't freaking out only about 1 40.

Slow on tape + 166 lbs+ 5.0 40=people freaking out

I don't know many slow possession type WR that weigh 166 lbs, that alone would have me concerned.

People are freaking out? You are freaking out! Speak for yourself and get over the 40 time.
We get commitments from big time recruits and people find ways to critize. Ridiculous

I simply asked if he slipped on the 40. If the 40 time is legit I don't believe that's Miami caliber.

 

[Zbrod95]

I think the staff should just drop a consensus 4 star WR based off the opinions of some message board posters.

Here u guys go again defending the staff blindly when dudes 40 isnt good. We have a right to question it period theres no 4.99 wrs in the nfl

hey didn't the best receiver of all time run a 4.7?

 

[Canesfan1899]

I think the staff should just drop a consensus 4 star WR based off the opinions of some message board posters.

Here u guys go again defending the staff blindly when dudes 40 isnt good. We have a right to question it period theres no 4.99 wrs in the nfl

hey didn't the best receiver of all time run a 4.7?

That's still not a 4.99. And let's not start comparing R. Scott to Jerry ******* Rice.

 

[Zbrod95]

I think the staff should just drop a consensus 4 star WR based off the opinions of some message board posters.

Here u guys go again defending the staff blindly when dudes 40 isnt good. We have a right to question it period theres no 4.99 wrs in the nfl

hey didn't the best receiver of all time run a 4.7?

That's still not a 4.99. And let's not start comparing R. Scott to Jerry ****ing Rice.

How the **** did you get me comparing R. Scott to Jerry Rice?? Where did you read that??