- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
- Messages
- 19,335
Who isn't in this year that should be in?
You think if Ohio State had the same resume but wasn't a big boy name bluebood program that we'd all have just assumed they were a lock and untouchable despite not even winning their division?
They've more than proven that they're a legit program under urban Meyer, including this season. Who in your mind is more deserving of a spot than Ohio state?
I'm not even saying Penn State should be in BUT if it was let's say Arizona State with that resume and not Ohio State then the committee would've left the non-conf champion out. I absolutely HATE this much of a human element controlling things as there will always be biases and laziness. You yourself just made the point about Ohio State's reputation having been "established"- a point that involves factoring previous seasons and national historical perception of programs. I'm not comfortable with that. Again, we would absolutely get screwed by a committee like this if it's us with a similar resume vs any of the teams or conferences that are the beneficiary of media bias.