forums

Question on Bowl prep?

Advertisement
OriginalCanesCanesCanes said:
Why? The game is 10 days away and they didn’t even say how many players or who they were.

If there are no after-effects it’s possible that those infected could play in 10 days. It might be close, but you have to assume that those that are positive now have had it for at least a few days. Aldo, these are not elderly men that have comorbid conditions.
Click to expand...
Washington state is getting hit with covid too. It’s just my opinion. I don’t know anything.
 
OriginalCanesCanesCanes said:
Why? The game is 10 days away and they didn’t even say how many players or who they were.

If there are no after-effects it’s possible that those infected could play in 10 days. It might be close, but you have to assume that those that are positive now have had it for at least a few days. Aldo, these are not elderly men that have comorbid conditions.
Click to expand...
No need for logic, when ignorance is bliss....
 
Advertisement
Invalid Username said:
Washington state is getting hit with covid too. It’s just my opinion. I don’t know anything.
Click to expand...

I don’t know anything about what’s going on with Washington state, so we’ll see. I know a lot of people have very little interest in this game. I would still like to see it though if it all possible.
 
Advertisement
Hoyacane1620 said:
Supposedly more than 85% are vaccinated. Could be break through positives with little to no symptoms
Click to expand...
I'd like to know how many cycles they are running to get these positive results. Anything 25 cycles and up can produce a positive result, but here in Manitoba they could not get any sample at 25+ cycles to grow in a culture. Meaning, it's not infectious, contagious, or harmful in any way. Still, they keep running tests over 40 cycles here. How are they running it down there?
 
I find this stuff works wonders...

a538d90a-45c6-4464-848e-022869255b59.webp
 
Advertisement
Tad Footeball said:
OP's question is perfectly legitimate (especially with a new coach watching) but I miss the annual theory that the bowl practices are beyond integral to shaping the following season's results. Seems like YEAR after YEAR we've been told that THIS year's ****ty result will start to be remedied NEXT year with these superrrr important bowl practices.
Click to expand...
Next year's results have to be what the practices are for, what else could it be? If they were for the bowl game, we'd probably win once in a while.
 
Running rampant throughout sports teams - college and pros. 213 in the NFL in the last week but most are cleared with a negative in a few days. We’re 10 days out so hopefully those who tested positive today will clear by then - game or no game.
 
Advertisement
ThomasM said:
I'd like to know how many cycles they are running to get these positive results. Anything 25 cycles and up can produce a positive result, but here in Manitoba they could not get any sample at 25+ cycles to grow in a culture. Meaning, it's not infectious, contagious, or harmful in any way. Still, they keep running tests over 40 cycles here. How are they running it down there?
Click to expand...
Pcr is junk...
 
kryptonite said:
Next year's results have to be what the practices are for, what else could it be? If they were for the bowl game, we'd probably win once in a while.
Click to expand...
Haha. Excellent point. Although we've typically lost early in the year in all these OOC games we've scheduled too.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top