forums

QBS in the Portal as of 11/28

Advertisement
407cane said:
Good I want to be those ****ers with him
Click to expand...
If You Say So Wow GIF by Identity
 
Advertisement
wnycanesfan said:
If true I would love to hear the logic since they denied Tua's brother who tried the same argument last year. I guess the NCAA could think that with the JUCO judgement that they may lose the case in court.
Click to expand...


Perhaps. But the JuCo issue was legit in light of NIL changes.

The Taulia/McCord issue is just a bright-line rule. Play in 5 games or more, no redshirt.

McCord threw three passes in that game. Taulia just took a knee.
 
Okay, why hasn’t Haynes King hit the portal? Have to imagine Tech is going to fully hand the keys to Philo next year.
 
Advertisement
SCarolina Ibis said:
Watched a few videos of Field Yates and Mel Kiper talking about QBs.

Both Kiper and Yates think Ewers needs another year. Milroe did too. Also agreed that Beck needs to stay in college for another year too. McShay definitely thinks Beck needs another year.

Yates said Ewers s a fringe 2nd round pick. Yates and Kiper both have Ewers outside their top 5 QBs.
Yates said that if Ewers is being offered millions in NIL, (paraphrasing from here) he should consider taking the money and boosting his draft stock.

Yates also said that from what he's gathered, Milroe would probably be the 3rd QB taken. But he went on to say that there's no guarantee that 3 QBs even go in the first round.
Kiper flat out says Milroe needed another year in college.

Todd McShay said “Carson Beck made a bad decision to leave early. I texted a bunch of guys in the league, GMs, former GMs, scouts. One Scout wrote back to me, one word answer — ‘foolish.”
Kiper has Beck as his #5 QB.

So who knows? Maybe Beck and Ewers both enter the poral.
Click to expand...
Rick Spielman said something similar about Ewers on his podcast
 
@TheOriginalCane if the NCAA changes from a 4yr+redshirt model to a 5yr-no redshirt model is it likely they lose a lawsuit filed by athletes who competed post-NIL implementation who didn't get 5 years for a lost year of NIL earnings? If so, I could see them relenting on McCord (and anyone else in college now in the same boat).
 
Advertisement
flips said:
@TheOriginalCane if the NCAA changes from a 4yr+redshirt model to a 5yr-no redshirt model is it likely they lose a lawsuit filed by athletes who competed post-NIL implementation who didn't get 5 years for a lost year of NIL earnings? If so, I could see them relenting on McCord (and anyone else in college now in the same boat).
Click to expand...


It's a fair question.

I was semi-joking about Taulia, but I'd tend to believe that anyone that is one-year (or more) removed from his eligibility will have no case. The only ones who might have a case are guys that still have a year that they COULD play (kinda like what happened with JuCo kids).

I think it would be hard to prove "what you could have gotten" for guys out of college more than one year. By letting the JuCo kids have another year or two, you are ALLOWING them to earn what they can earn now, not "what they could have earned then".

But, who knows, crazier things have happened. Would be funny to see all these old dudes getting injunctions to go back to school.

I knew a diver like that once...


Back To School Summer GIF by Rodney Dangerfield
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top