TC@ne
3rd party advocate. Anti-mope & anti-slurper.
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2018
- Messages
- 4,082
If we were in the court of law im sure you’d be spot on.When did UM/Mario set that expectation, publicly, for it to be deemed "fact"?
Last I checked the words of 3rd parties can't be deemed fact regardless of their relation to the 1st party. Especially Without evidence the 1st party ever even took part or agreed with the information being released.
But it’s been established that those who have communicated a timeline to us have a relationship where they communicate the staff’s expectation and have basically said so (D$ LITERALLY posting UM’s expectation).
Now whether you care or not if that connection is publicly established by the 1st party (of course it won’t be), and require that to come to the conclusion that this is not going as planned, that’s up to you.
I understand this is a college football message board and reading between the lines is required, so I’m not gonna wait for Mario to post a video on here saying they have sources who communicate on their behalf to come to my conclusion.
Again, doesn’t mean the result can’t still be the desired outcome, but it’s my strong opinion the path we take there will be more tumultuous than the program expected.