When you have 12 guys(Which is what most teams run with) and 6 are unavailable, how is that on the coach? Let that settle in. Our fans are morons and it's beyond frustrating watching as they demand change, for something that no coach would be able to overcome. Even if you had 12 future NBA players on the roster, you lose 6 of them, that's going to affect the product.
1. Injuries are part of the game. They happened to everyone and at random times. Some are cursed, some are lucky. Nobody faults Coach because kids go down, per se. Some years are a fluke, this being one.
2. Yes, we have 12 guys on scholarship but 1 of them (i.e. EO) shouldn't count because it was a fluke that he is eligible NOW. We didn't apply for a waiver but the NCAA said ___________ and everyone can play. EO being eligible is a gift that was unexpected. Coach went into this season believing that he would only have 11 active ships. Of those 11, 1 (Gak) has been pretty much injured his whole tenure and not reliable. More on this to come.
3. For numerous years, we haven't filled the class and used all our scholarships. I am unclear why we consistently go into each season SAVING scholarships but it certainly wouldn't hurt having another active player.
4. As for the guys currently on scholarship, some are pretty useless. With that said, if you're going to (a) carry subpar guys on the roster and (b) not fill the class, you better make sure that the scholarships you do use are quality and not waste.
5. As for our specific injuries RIGHT NOW. Not all of them are the same. Clearly Lykes and Kam are major. We know they're starters and average ~28 PPG (combined). Lykes clearly gives us something on offense that we desperately need. Those injuries REALLY HURT.
As for big men, Brooks is 10000 times better than anything we had last year. Walker is pretty solid, getting better, and he should have minutes over Rodney and Sam. As for Gak, he looks good given his condition. I like him more than Rodney.
But Rodney, useless. Sam, wouldn't hurt to have him. We should win without them especially when the other 3 (e.g. Brooks, Walker this year and Gak) are better than what we had last year.
As for Timberlake, we've seen regression from Bev. It would not hurt to have Timberlake.
-----
One thing on Coaching: Why are we continuing to do stupid things? These kids can't shoot but we continue to chuck and chuck and chuck 3s.
As for the last 3 games, we're 8-60 from the 3PTL. Is coach really pushing this strategy? If that is the case, why?