lauderdaleballer
Senior
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Messages
- 4,396
One thing that I've noticed about a lot of SF LB's over the years, is they really struggle playing LB at the next level.
It's been that way across the board regardless of where they ended up signing, whether it be Miami, UF, FSU or elsewhere. They're highly ranked & looked great in HS & then get to college & disappear.
I can't really think of the last SF LB that's been dominant or done much of anything in a really long time.
You’ll find productive linebackers if you think about
One thing that I've noticed about a lot of SF LB's over the years, is they really struggle playing LB at the next level.
It's been that way across the board regardless of where they ended up signing, whether it be Miami, UF, FSU or elsewhere. They're highly ranked & looked great in HS & then get to college & disappear.
I can't really think of the last SF LB that's been dominant or done much of anything in a really long time.
We have productive lbs at all levels. However, you raised a great point and I think it’s mostly because many of these kids don’t actually play lb or have lb responsibilities. They either blitz most of the time or standing up on the edge.
IMO, Graham’s issue is that he may need more time to develop and actually learn the position . Keep in mind that Strana
It's been a while, but Perryman & Spence were definitely the goods.
Devin Bush