- Joined
- Dec 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,001
The mopes would've moped with any outcome yesterday. Let's go over a few.
-If we came up with injuries, they would've said the Spring game should have been cancelled because we have no depth.
-If Olsen lit up the D, the mopes would've been cursing Dfr's scheme.
-If the running game dominated, it's because AG has diabetes/is fat.
-If the Defense dominates, they're going against a RsFr QB/Coley's offense sucks.
-If the D got edge pressure, Gadbois is a JAG.
Same ol BS over and over again. Rinse, wash, repeat.
I'm rustled. That was a debacle yesterday any way you slice it.
I guess we look at things differently. While there are areas of concern, there were also positives. The Unis, Kamalu, Gus, Kirby, Hertelou, Crawford, Bush to mention a few. Add those to what we know we have in Duke, Stacey, Flowers, Figs AQM/McCord. It's not all that bad.
Olsen is the obvious glaring area of concern. But like I said in another thread and got negged to oblivion, if he didn't fvck off last season and put in work he would've been
much better yesterday. But according to many, it's a rights to passage to take a giant **** on the team and "get laid". Obviously from yesterday Olsen looked like a guy who hasn't seen live action in that type of situation since his Junior year of high school. You're right, that is a bit of a black cloud over yesterday.
I think you're both right. It's a hard day to digest. The first thing we should look at are our expectations going in. Were they too high considering all the factors? We're coming off a poor performance in a bowl game, with a RS-Fr. QB making his first meaningful appearance. We're also a team coming into a new season with ton of maturing young players, who are expected to elevate their games. We're a team without our top QB and RB. We're also a team that didn't lose a **** thing to graduation. You make that determination.
You also need to match those expectations with what the program expected to get out of yesterday. What do we know? We know from their comments that they stayed simple on both sides of the ball (I'll take their comments for what they're worth, nothing more; I have a hard time just assuming everything they say is misdirection or a lie [their comments match up with their intent regarding the Canes Camp videos; they cut every play to not show front/formation, action, or shifts/motions]). They also expected to have fans on the field. Anybody with any filming equipment could be on the field. They could film a tight copy, they could listen to our calls and checks. Also, we know that they expected to have a good result on the field. No one wants to look like ****.
The problem with spring games are that expectations are very rarely equal. Gameday is easy. We just want to win the **** game.
After you manage your emotions, we can now look at the product on the field. Any argument you make after that is valid, if within reason.