I think some of u r misunderstanding Clemson’s recruiting strategy, while also misunderstanding how the rating system work. It’s why we were duped into thinking the 2008 class was the #1 class.
Since 2015, Clemson have had:
2015 - #9 class
2016 - #11 class
2017 - #16 class
2018 - #7 class
2019 - #12 class
2020 - #3 class
2021 - #5 class
2022 - #14 class
2023 - #13 class
Over the past 9 cycles, Clemson’s avg. class has been #10 in the nation, hardly on par w/ the Bama’s, OSU’s, UGA’s, **** even Texas. So y has Clemson gone 100-12 during this time frame, winning 2 titles, playing for another 2, while bytch slapping The ACC? It’s b/c of an established system + a high blue chip ratio per majority of their class.
2015: 50%
2016: 62%
2017: 71%
2018: 71%
2019: 45% (worst class)
2020: 74%
2021: 95%
2022: 48%
2023: 73%
Before we worry about Clemson, our identity needs to be established; ****, we don’t even know who our OC is going to be, & if it remains Gattis…..yeah, well….
Once a productive identity is established on both sides of the ball, then our recruiting can become on autopilot where class rankings won’t matter as much, knowing whoever we recruit will be another fit to an establishment.