Revenue share model is going to mean schools are drafting contracts with the kids instead of a letter of intent. This was a needed step towards that.Seems bad.
Now you have to recruit a kid yearly. No window to take a break.
I guess contract can shut the kid down from looking. That works.Revenue share model is going to mean schools are drafting contracts with the kids instead of a letter of intent. This was a needed step towards that.
I think the model is going to be longer tenured players get more $. So you’re incentivizing staying at a school.I guess contract can shut the kid down from looking. That works.
Revenue share model is going to mean schools are drafting contracts with the kids instead of a letter of intent. This was a needed step towards that.
Is a NLI really binding with free transfer rules?Is it not binding like NLI is once signed?
That is NOT how things are done on CiS. Overreact NOW!I'll wait for more information here.
Is a NLI really binding with free transfer rules?
You could sign an NLI and go somewhere else the next day
They cannot eliminate NIL. They can attempt to eliminate the payments from the schools masquerading as NIL but they cannot eliminate NIL. The Courts would have a field day with them
NLI is not NIL. No one mentioned eliminating NIL.They cannot eliminate NIL. They can attempt to eliminate the payments from the schools masquerading as NIL but they cannot eliminate NIL. The Courts would have a field day with them
Is a NLI really binding with free transfer rules?
You could sign an NLI and go somewhere else the next day
Dwayne should start signing these high schoolers to the XFL.College basically minor league football at this point.