NCAA to consider early signing period for HS fb recruits

[MedleyCane]

This would be great for Miami

Not necessarily true.
In fact, may be a bad thing.

 

[NY Shyne]

It eliminates last minute $EC boosters offering recruits parents jobs when their plan A falls thru.

Meaningless. Those thinking this eliminates games are crazy.

 

[gogeta4]

against it..wont be good for miami

 

[SoCalPete73]

This will further tilt things in favor of the schools & the kids will suffer.

 

[Canes21]

If a kid wants to stay committed they will. If they want to play games they will wait until NSD. It won't change too much. All it does it make the guys that are committed for good become official.

 

[LA\^/]

This will make commitments truly meaningless.

If we have a kid committed and doesn't sign an early LOI, he will be berated to oblivion.

 

[Dwinstitles]

Meaningless. Those thinking this eliminates games are crazy.

U Polly right

 

[Dwinstitles]

It illiminates last minute $EC boosters offering recruits parents jobs when their plan A falls thru.

Meaningless. Those thinking this eliminates games are crazy.

So they will offer it earlier

 

[Dwinstitles]

against it..wont be good for miami

Honest question y?

 

[canesthing3]

Can the people saying it won't be good for Miami elaborate? Because I'm not seeing it.

 

[JHallCanes]

It illiminates last minute $EC boosters offering recruits parents jobs when their plan A falls thru.

Meaningless. Those thinking this eliminates games are crazy.

Maybe. But the game is all about loopholes. You can change the circumstances, but it ultimately won't matter.

 

[Consigliere]

This will further tilt things in favor of the schools & the kids will suffer.

Please explain.

 

[Consigliere]

It illiminates last minute $EC boosters offering recruits parents jobs when their plan A falls thru.

Meaningless. Those thinking this eliminates games are crazy.

Maybe. But the game is all about loopholes. You can change the circumstances, but it ultimately won't matter.

So even though you haven't thought one ("loophole"), you're against it.

It eliminates a lot of the uncertainty and bullchit. No longer are kids committed to a school. You're first committed when you sign. If you don't sign, when able to, you're like everyone else...undecided and uncommitted.

 

[Consigliere]

against it..wont be good for miami

Please explain Prop Joe.

 

[ScubaCane]

Will we need more or less cakes?

 

[JHallCanes]

It illiminates last minute $EC boosters offering recruits parents jobs when their plan A falls thru.

Meaningless. Those thinking this eliminates games are crazy.

Maybe. But the game is all about loopholes. You can change the circumstances, but it ultimately won't matter.

So even though you haven't thought one ("loophole"), you're against it.

It eliminates a lot of the uncertainty and bullchit. No longer are kids committed to a school. You're first committed when you sign. If you don't sign, when able to, you're like everyone else...undecided and uncommitted.

Did I say I was against it?

Dont make **** up ************.

Its not that big a deal, certainly doesn't alleviate signing day meltdowns like some are thinking. It's pretty clear, but whatever. Y'all can think whatever you want.

 

[bransuperpower]

not a fan of the July signing period but I do like the December one. I think if you got a system where 80-90% of your class is signed and you have a month to finish out the rest of your class can be a huge benefit to us. It also elevates some players we was going to waste our time with that is taking free trips in Jan

 

[Consigliere]

It illiminates last minute $EC boosters offering recruits parents jobs when their plan A falls thru.

Meaningless. Those thinking this eliminates games are crazy.

Maybe. But the game is all about loopholes. You can change the circumstances, but it ultimately won't matter.

So even though you haven't thought one ("loophole"), you're against it.

It eliminates a lot of the uncertainty and bullchit. No longer are kids committed to a school. You're first committed when you sign. If you don't sign, when able to, you're like everyone else...undecided and uncommitted.

Did I say I was against it?

Dont make **** up ************.

Its not that big a deal, certainly doesn't alleviate signing day meltdowns like some are thinking. It's pretty clear, but whatever. Y'all can think whatever you want.

OMG, you called me a "************".

Did you say you're against it? No. You said it was "meaningless". You said the game is all about "loopholes". You act like you're against it. Not sure why you would call it "meaningless" if you were for it. I suppose you can be indifferent.

So ************, are you for it? Against it? Indifferent?

 

[JHallCanes]

It illiminates last minute $EC boosters offering recruits parents jobs when their plan A falls thru.

Maybe. But the game is all about loopholes. You can change the circumstances, but it ultimately won't matter.

So even though you haven't thought one ("loophole"), you're against it.

It eliminates a lot of the uncertainty and bullchit. No longer are kids committed to a school. You're first committed when you sign. If you don't sign, when able to, you're like everyone else...undecided and uncommitted.

Did I say I was against it?

Dont make **** up ************.

Its not that big a deal, certainly doesn't alleviate signing day meltdowns like some are thinking. It's pretty clear, but whatever. Y'all can think whatever you want.

OMG, you called me a "************".

Did you say you're against it? No. You said it was "meaningless". You said the game is all about "loopholes". You act like you're against it. Not sure why you would call it "meaningless" if you were for it. I suppose you can be indifferent.

So ************, are you for it? Against it? Indifferent?

I would explain things slowly for you, but as everyone who has been around here long enough knows, you're a well documented **** that would never admit to being as dumb as you actually are.

I don't need to explain the obviousness of recruiting. Best of luck on your future endeavors.

 

[Consigliere]

Maybe. But the game is all about loopholes. You can change the circumstances, but it ultimately won't matter.

So even though you haven't thought one ("loophole"), you're against it.

It eliminates a lot of the uncertainty and bullchit. No longer are kids committed to a school. You're first committed when you sign. If you don't sign, when able to, you're like everyone else...undecided and uncommitted.

Did I say I was against it?

Dont make **** up ************.

Its not that big a deal, certainly doesn't alleviate signing day meltdowns like some are thinking. It's pretty clear, but whatever. Y'all can think whatever you want.

OMG, you called me a "************".

Did you say you're against it? No. You said it was "meaningless". You said the game is all about "loopholes". You act like you're against it. Not sure why you would call it "meaningless" if you were for it. I suppose you can be indifferent.

So ************, are you for it? Against it? Indifferent?

I would explain things slowly for you, but as everyone who has been around here long enough knows, you're a well documented **** that would never admit to being as dumb as you actually are.

I don't need to explain the obviousness of recruiting. Best of luck on your future endeavors.

And you're a potato who chugs cack.

Do you want to answer the question or continue being funny?