forums

NCAA rumors from CS

Jacory who has the most INTs in the history of Miami football will be wiped off the records?

Thanks, NCAA.

\if true, I really mean it

\\but still, go ***** yourself NCAA
 
Advertisement
The stench of BS just reeks from that article.

First off, to suggest the NCAA has the authority to ban former players from the University is a damned lie.

Second, to suggest another bowl ban is a damned lie. No one, and I mean NO ONE has ever suffered three year bowl bans.

Our punishment will be a possible three year probation, PLUS the punishments already self-served. That in of itself is already substantial.

The writer needs to quit hitting the crack pipe and pressure wash his rotten ******. It won't help the smell, but at least he'll be able to sit still and not squirm so much.
 
Advertisement
i mean we can all get ****ed but look at the bright side

if NCAA sais we need to ban players from coming to campus, and wipe records etc we tell them ok.. no problem lets start from 2003 maybe 2004? to 2012 thats 8-9 years worth

lets just pretend those years didn't happen. we cool? cool!.. lets go!
 
Advertisement
How the **** does a non legal organization ban former players from the schools campus that they attended, because they are butthurt over the lack of cooperation of these former players?
 
duke4heisman said:
http://miami.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=1213&tid=190314050&mid=190314050&sid=903&style=2



Things I am hearing on the NCAA front

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No announcement likely this week. Obviously I am not certain of this, but the info I am getting seems pretty solid in this regard. Some think it could go into September.
As many as 15 former players who were involved with Shapiro could receive 10 year-bans from campus and program affiliation due to non-cooperation with the NCAA. There are several big names who could end up on this list. I am not going to speculate on specifics because I really don't know what will happen here and who will be on the list. But I have heard that the NCAA is pointing very strongly in this direction. If they do follow through, some of the biggest names in Canes football history could be wiped from the record books. It could go down the way it did for Reggie Bush at USC where all of his records were erased from the University record book as if he had never played there.
The University would not be likely to fight this as it would make little sense for them to fight things that deflect punishment onto the involved parties and away from the institution.
People who are involved and in the know have no idea when this thing is going to hit. Ignore anybody that tries to tell you that they know. They are probably trying to guess so they look like a genius.
Miami has moved its compliance offices into the new Schwartz Center, bringing the people who work on compliance in the dept closer to the football program. This makes a statement to the NCAA that UM is serious about compliance.
Five years of probation is being discussed in Indianapolis but no final decision has supposedly been made yet.
There is a strong assumption that there will be some scholarship reductions, as has been discussed throughout the process.
Click to expand...


I seriously hope Ferman is wrong. Let's put it in to perspective... here's what USC got.

• Two bowl bans (MIAMI SELF-IMPOSED TWO BOWL BANS)

• A loss of 30 total football scholarships over three seasons (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• A vacation of all football victories starting in December 2004 and running through the 2005 season. This includes the national championship win over Oklahoma on Jan. 4, 2005. (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• All statistics vacated for Bush, Mayo and women’s tennis athlete Gabriela Niculescu in the games which the NCAA deemed them ineligible due to rules violations. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Bush and Mayo must be disassociated from USC athletics. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Four years of probation (FERMAN SAYING WE'RE GETTING FIVE YEARS)



So, this is why I'm worried. If Ferman is right about the probation and the other penalties, that means that in every area, our penalties will have been worse or equal to USC's.

That means if Ferman is right, expect to lose 30 ships over 3 years. That would cripple us.
 
Ernie McCracken said:
duke4heisman said:
http://miami.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=1213&tid=190314050&mid=190314050&sid=903&style=2



Things I am hearing on the NCAA front

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No announcement likely this week. Obviously I am not certain of this, but the info I am getting seems pretty solid in this regard. Some think it could go into September.
As many as 15 former players who were involved with Shapiro could receive 10 year-bans from campus and program affiliation due to non-cooperation with the NCAA. There are several big names who could end up on this list. I am not going to speculate on specifics because I really don't know what will happen here and who will be on the list. But I have heard that the NCAA is pointing very strongly in this direction. If they do follow through, some of the biggest names in Canes football history could be wiped from the record books. It could go down the way it did for Reggie Bush at USC where all of his records were erased from the University record book as if he had never played there.
The University would not be likely to fight this as it would make little sense for them to fight things that deflect punishment onto the involved parties and away from the institution.
People who are involved and in the know have no idea when this thing is going to hit. Ignore anybody that tries to tell you that they know. They are probably trying to guess so they look like a genius.
Miami has moved its compliance offices into the new Schwartz Center, bringing the people who work on compliance in the dept closer to the football program. This makes a statement to the NCAA that UM is serious about compliance.
Five years of probation is being discussed in Indianapolis but no final decision has supposedly been made yet.
There is a strong assumption that there will be some scholarship reductions, as has been discussed throughout the process.
Click to expand...


I seriously hope Ferman is wrong. Let's put it in to perspective... here's what USC got.

• Two bowl bans (MIAMI SELF-IMPOSED TWO BOWL BANS)

• A loss of 30 total football scholarships over three seasons (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• A vacation of all football victories starting in December 2004 and running through the 2005 season. This includes the national championship win over Oklahoma on Jan. 4, 2005. (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• All statistics vacated for Bush, Mayo and women’s tennis athlete Gabriela Niculescu in the games which the NCAA deemed them ineligible due to rules violations. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Bush and Mayo must be disassociated from USC athletics. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Four years of probation (FERMAN SAYING WE'RE GETTING FIVE YEARS)



So, this is why I'm worried. If Ferman is right about the probation and the other penalties, that means that in every area, our penalties will have been worse or equal to USC's.

That means if Ferman is right, expect to lose 30 ships over 3 years. That would cripple us.
Click to expand...

USC refused to cooperate with the NCAA, we have bent over backwards to help those ******* out!
 
losdogcane said:
Ernie McCracken said:
duke4heisman said:
http://miami.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=1213&tid=190314050&mid=190314050&sid=903&style=2



Things I am hearing on the NCAA front

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No announcement likely this week. Obviously I am not certain of this, but the info I am getting seems pretty solid in this regard. Some think it could go into September.
As many as 15 former players who were involved with Shapiro could receive 10 year-bans from campus and program affiliation due to non-cooperation with the NCAA. There are several big names who could end up on this list. I am not going to speculate on specifics because I really don't know what will happen here and who will be on the list. But I have heard that the NCAA is pointing very strongly in this direction. If they do follow through, some of the biggest names in Canes football history could be wiped from the record books. It could go down the way it did for Reggie Bush at USC where all of his records were erased from the University record book as if he had never played there.
The University would not be likely to fight this as it would make little sense for them to fight things that deflect punishment onto the involved parties and away from the institution.
People who are involved and in the know have no idea when this thing is going to hit. Ignore anybody that tries to tell you that they know. They are probably trying to guess so they look like a genius.
Miami has moved its compliance offices into the new Schwartz Center, bringing the people who work on compliance in the dept closer to the football program. This makes a statement to the NCAA that UM is serious about compliance.
Five years of probation is being discussed in Indianapolis but no final decision has supposedly been made yet.
There is a strong assumption that there will be some scholarship reductions, as has been discussed throughout the process.
Click to expand...


I seriously hope Ferman is wrong. Let's put it in to perspective... here's what USC got.

• Two bowl bans (MIAMI SELF-IMPOSED TWO BOWL BANS)

• A loss of 30 total football scholarships over three seasons (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• A vacation of all football victories starting in December 2004 and running through the 2005 season. This includes the national championship win over Oklahoma on Jan. 4, 2005. (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• All statistics vacated for Bush, Mayo and women’s tennis athlete Gabriela Niculescu in the games which the NCAA deemed them ineligible due to rules violations. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Bush and Mayo must be disassociated from USC athletics. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Four years of probation (FERMAN SAYING WE'RE GETTING FIVE YEARS)



So, this is why I'm worried. If Ferman is right about the probation and the other penalties, that means that in every area, our penalties will have been worse or equal to USC's.

That means if Ferman is right, expect to lose 30 ships over 3 years. That would cripple us.
Click to expand...

USC refused to cooperate with the NCAA, we have bent over backwards to help those ****es out!
Click to expand...

Yeah but the NCAA are a collection of douchebags and I won't be the least bit surprised if they try to ***** us every way possible regardless.
 
Advertisement
Ernie McCracken said:
losdogcane said:
Ernie McCracken said:
duke4heisman said:
http://miami.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=1213&tid=190314050&mid=190314050&sid=903&style=2



Things I am hearing on the NCAA front

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No announcement likely this week. Obviously I am not certain of this, but the info I am getting seems pretty solid in this regard. Some think it could go into September.
As many as 15 former players who were involved with Shapiro could receive 10 year-bans from campus and program affiliation due to non-cooperation with the NCAA. There are several big names who could end up on this list. I am not going to speculate on specifics because I really don't know what will happen here and who will be on the list. But I have heard that the NCAA is pointing very strongly in this direction. If they do follow through, some of the biggest names in Canes football history could be wiped from the record books. It could go down the way it did for Reggie Bush at USC where all of his records were erased from the University record book as if he had never played there.
The University would not be likely to fight this as it would make little sense for them to fight things that deflect punishment onto the involved parties and away from the institution.
People who are involved and in the know have no idea when this thing is going to hit. Ignore anybody that tries to tell you that they know. They are probably trying to guess so they look like a genius.
Miami has moved its compliance offices into the new Schwartz Center, bringing the people who work on compliance in the dept closer to the football program. This makes a statement to the NCAA that UM is serious about compliance.
Five years of probation is being discussed in Indianapolis but no final decision has supposedly been made yet.
There is a strong assumption that there will be some scholarship reductions, as has been discussed throughout the process.
Click to expand...


I seriously hope Ferman is wrong. Let's put it in to perspective... here's what USC got.

• Two bowl bans (MIAMI SELF-IMPOSED TWO BOWL BANS)

• A loss of 30 total football scholarships over three seasons (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• A vacation of all football victories starting in December 2004 and running through the 2005 season. This includes the national championship win over Oklahoma on Jan. 4, 2005. (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• All statistics vacated for Bush, Mayo and women’s tennis athlete Gabriela Niculescu in the games which the NCAA deemed them ineligible due to rules violations. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Bush and Mayo must be disassociated from USC athletics. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Four years of probation (FERMAN SAYING WE'RE GETTING FIVE YEARS)



So, this is why I'm worried. If Ferman is right about the probation and the other penalties, that means that in every area, our penalties will have been worse or equal to USC's.

That means if Ferman is right, expect to lose 30 ships over 3 years. That would cripple us.
Click to expand...

USC refused to cooperate with the NCAA, we have bent over backwards to help those ****es out!
Click to expand...

Yeah but the NCAA are a collection of douchebags and I won't be the least bit surprised if they try to ***** us every way possible regardless.
Click to expand...

Bush and Mayo being disassociated from USC was a school choice not an NCAA one
 
Advertisement
Get ready for war. Be prepared for a penalty that nobody will like. I'd have a stroke if it was as bad as USC. Nothing will surprise me though. Timing wise, we have to be close. No later than week of 8/19.
 
losdogcane said:
Ernie McCracken said:
duke4heisman said:
http://miami.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=1213&tid=190314050&mid=190314050&sid=903&style=2



Things I am hearing on the NCAA front

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No announcement likely this week. Obviously I am not certain of this, but the info I am getting seems pretty solid in this regard. Some think it could go into September.
As many as 15 former players who were involved with Shapiro could receive 10 year-bans from campus and program affiliation due to non-cooperation with the NCAA. There are several big names who could end up on this list. I am not going to speculate on specifics because I really don't know what will happen here and who will be on the list. But I have heard that the NCAA is pointing very strongly in this direction. If they do follow through, some of the biggest names in Canes football history could be wiped from the record books. It could go down the way it did for Reggie Bush at USC where all of his records were erased from the University record book as if he had never played there.
The University would not be likely to fight this as it would make little sense for them to fight things that deflect punishment onto the involved parties and away from the institution.
People who are involved and in the know have no idea when this thing is going to hit. Ignore anybody that tries to tell you that they know. They are probably trying to guess so they look like a genius.
Miami has moved its compliance offices into the new Schwartz Center, bringing the people who work on compliance in the dept closer to the football program. This makes a statement to the NCAA that UM is serious about compliance.
Five years of probation is being discussed in Indianapolis but no final decision has supposedly been made yet.
There is a strong assumption that there will be some scholarship reductions, as has been discussed throughout the process.
Click to expand...


I seriously hope Ferman is wrong. Let's put it in to perspective... here's what USC got.

• Two bowl bans (MIAMI SELF-IMPOSED TWO BOWL BANS)

• A loss of 30 total football scholarships over three seasons (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• A vacation of all football victories starting in December 2004 and running through the 2005 season. This includes the national championship win over Oklahoma on Jan. 4, 2005. (WE DON'T KNOW YET)

• All statistics vacated for Bush, Mayo and women’s tennis athlete Gabriela Niculescu in the games which the NCAA deemed them ineligible due to rules violations. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Bush and Mayo must be disassociated from USC athletics. (FERMAN SAYING WE ARE GETTING THE SAME FOR OUR GUYS)

• Four years of probation (FERMAN SAYING WE'RE GETTING FIVE YEARS)



So, this is why I'm worried. If Ferman is right about the probation and the other penalties, that means that in every area, our penalties will have been worse or equal to USC's.

That means if Ferman is right, expect to lose 30 ships over 3 years. That would cripple us.
Click to expand...

USC refused to cooperate with the NCAA, we have bent over backwards to help those ****es out!
Click to expand...


If Miami gets 30 schollies lost and possibly another bowl game, it'll be an explicit signal to every A.D. in the nation that no school should cooperate with a NCAA investigation ever again.

Notwithstanding the fact this NCAA ***** storm would never occur at one of the blue blooded protected schools.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top