NCAA rejects Miami motion

Problem2

All-American
Premium
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
17,484
Miami officials aren't the only ones still waiting for closure from the NCAA on its investigation into the program.

ACC commissioner John Swofford told ESPN.com on Thursday that the mere length of this case is "a sanction in itself." A hearing is scheduled to begin in June, but Miami officials filed a motion about a month ago to dismiss the case before it even gets that far. Miami is not commenting publicly on whether or not the NCAA has granted or denied its motion, but a school representative said the university has heard from the Committee on Infractions and that, "as of now, we are progressing towards the hearing."

The NCAA did not immediately return a phone call and email seeking comment on Friday afternoon.

“I think Miami has handled its part of this in a quality way and a very appropriate way and has addressed it head-up with self-imposed sanctions," Swofford said. "Hopefully this will be coming to an end in the next few months because it’s dragged on long enough. That’s a sanction in itself, when something of this nature drags on literally for years without being brought to a conclusion. So hopefully we’re near the end of it.”

http://espn.go.com/blog/acc/post/_/id/55106/acc-commish-ready-for-closure-on-miami-case

So, does that mean they got denied? Interesting wording

Edit: Updated

In a move that was disappointing but not surprising to UM, the NCAA this week ruled out Miami’s slim hopes of the case being dismissed before UM and former Hurricanes coaches have a full hearing in front of the infractions committee on June 14-16 in Indianapolis, according to multiple sources.

Temple law professor Eleanor Myers, a member of the NCAA’s infractions committee, informed UM and four former Hurricanes coaches that she does not believe she has the authority to dismiss the case pre-hearing. The infractions committee had given Myers the assignment of ruling on UM’s and the coaches’ motions to dismiss.

It always seemed unlikely to everyone involved that Myers would take the step of dismissing the case on her own – even though UM and the coaches presented compelling evidence for why the case has been tainted.

Myers told the parties they still have the option to present the motion to dismiss at the full hearing, and UM and the four coaches (Frank Haith, Jorge Fernandez, Jake Morton and Aubrey Hill) will again try to get the case dismissed then.

But it’s considered unlikely that the infraction committee would dismiss the case several hours into the hearing on June 14. What’s more likely is that the eight infractions committee members who are assigned to the case would hear all of the evidence from UM, the coaches, and the NCAA’s enforcement staff and then make a decision in the aftermath – a decision that could take weeks or a few months.

The hearing, at NCAA headquarters in Indianapolis, is expected to last two or three days.

http://miamiherald.typepad.com/sports-buzz/#storylink=cpy
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Denied, but no comment because COI is going to hear the case (and I don't think Miami is allowed to comment on it?). I'd bet it's time served at this point though and the COI tosses a bunch of the evidence at the hearing itself. Just IMHO

P.S. Don't be surprised if that ****** Emmert leaks it out
 
Definitely interesting wording. Seems to leave open the possibility of still avoiding the hearing, although I've always thought that very unlikely. Doesn't sound like the COI summarily dismissed it either, though.

Hopefully this June hearing is just a dog and pony show to help maintain the illusion that the NCAA is in control and know what it's doing. Then we get the fair conclusion of "time served," and everybody moves on.
 
Advertisement
The entire process is completely ****ed.

Why is the hearing way in June? Why couldn't it have been this month or last month if they have all the evidence already? I mean, they were investigating Miami for two years.

This is absolutely ridiculous.
 
from what I read I think Miami was told that it can't be dismissed at this moment but the COI will have that opportunity to address the motion in June
 
Man I swear every update about this investigation ****es me off more and more.
 
Advertisement
be thankful that

1. Shapiro is a criminal
2. The NCAA went after Miami with a point to prove
3. NCAA decided to bed/break every rule they have to try to bring down miami
4. Shapiro hired a greedy scum attorney EP
5. EP decided to help the NCAA
6. Peewee Allen gave a full testimony and brought up information that the NCAA later used to follow up on other items
7. The NCAA investigator wrote letters behalf of Shapiro
8. Emerrett is the current president of the NCAA


remember kids, weather we like it or not Miami players took money and gifts from Shapiro, so the best case scenario here was actually... this lol

NCAA messed up their own case. I think the punishment we served on ourselves is fair and that is that

If the NCAA did not ***** this up we would of been done.
 
We need to continue to find ways for the NCAA to look bad in the media. That is really where this case is being fought.
 
They were never going to approve the motion to dismiss. This isn't at all surprising.

I agree. I am not a lawyer, but from a logical business sense, they go through the hearing, tell the world we have been very bad, but have already done enough punishment, and therefore its over.
 
be thankful that

1. Shapiro is a criminal
2. The NCAA went after Miami with a point to prove
3. NCAA decided to bed/break every rule they have to try to bring down miami
4. Shapiro hired a greedy scum attorney EP
5. EP decided to help the NCAA
6. Peewee Allen gave a full testimony and brought up information that the NCAA later used to follow up on other items
7. The NCAA investigator wrote letters behalf of Shapiro
8. Emerrett is the current president of the NCAA


remember kids, weather we like it or not Miami players took money and gifts from Shapiro, so the best case scenario here was actually... this lol

NCAA messed up their own case. I think the punishment we served on ourselves is fair and that is that

If the NCAA did not ***** this up we would of been done.

Completely agree.
 
Advertisement
They were never going to approve the motion to dismiss. This isn't at all surprising.

I agree. I am not a lawyer, but from a logical business sense, they go through the hearing, tell the world we have been very bad, but have already done enough punishment, and therefore its over.

Something like this.

NCAA has to hit UM with a 2 year bowl ban (which Miami retroactively took care of). People seem to miss this. The NCAA cannot throw out the case. It would be their undoing if they did a 2 year investigation, which forced Miami to assess themselves bowl bans and a conference championship ban, only to throw their hands up and say "Oops we screwed up, no penalties!"
 
Advertisement
13.jpg
 
Some of you should self ban. Seriously. Yes the ncaa needs to find stuff bc we already sat two bowls. What profound logic! The ncaa shouldbthrow out the case bc it is built on fecal matter. Deal with the consequences when you lie and cheat to find BS.

D$ when are you cleaning this cesspool?
 
Some of you should self ban. Seriously. Yes the ncaa needs to find stuff bc we already sat two bowls. What profound logic! The ncaa shouldbthrow out the case bc it is built on fecal matter. Deal with the consequences when you lie and cheat to find BS.

D$ when are you cleaning this cesspool?

1.gif
 
Some of you should self ban. Seriously. Yes the ncaa needs to find stuff bc we already sat two bowls. What profound logic! The ncaa shouldbthrow out the case bc it is built on fecal matter. Deal with the consequences when you lie and cheat to find BS.

D$ when are you cleaning this cesspool?

Bruh you need to calm down..
 
Advertisement
Back
Top