I read the whole thing too, with a keen eye for this shi-. what it says to me is, here is your one warning shot across the bow, ball's in your court. This is an outline of what will be in a massive federal lawsuit designed to bring down the NCAA or at least its enforcement arm and force a redesign of tis entire department. Emert will be named individually, so will many others. Intentional concealment, misrepresentations, fraud, gross negligence. If the NCAA doesn't respond, and continues to act as if their misdeeds (as documented meticulously in this motion) are no big deal, that in and of itself will be used against them later in civil suit depositions (i.e., so what did you think about this; did you investigate these charges further before you lowered the hammer at the June 15 hearing; why didn't you clarify that point and concede any missteps; don't you now agree in retrospect that they were right about this point, that point, the other; you had the chance to respond and correct any misinformation, misrepresentations, inaccuracies in the Caldwalder report, etc. and you didn't; why not?). They will be in a world of hurt if they stand idly by and accept everything as presented.
this is the warning. This is the blueprint. Discovery of the NCAA emails in a federal suit will establish clearly who knew what and when about all these issues, and that they were told to shut up, delete, or not to worry for whatever callous reason. Sure, there will be arguably incriminating emails on the U's end, but the trial will center around what the NCAA did wrong, not around the U at that point.