D
Deleted member 25284
Guest
Excuse me what?Pope was a JAG in high school. He had like 20 catches, 230 yards & 4 TDs his senior year. He was killing em on the 7 on 7 circuit & had a 4.4 40 though.
Excuse me what?Pope was a JAG in high school. He had like 20 catches, 230 yards & 4 TDs his senior year. He was killing em on the 7 on 7 circuit & had a 4.4 40 though.
What part surprised you?Excuse me what?
I never knew his actual stat line from real ball. I knew he was a superstar flag football player and his route running skills and open field ability looked like it would translate to the next level. No way should we have taken him if that was his stat line.What part surprised you?
Excuse me what?
What part surprised you?
Man the name Mark Pope rung bells even in Texas when he came to me with that stat line I was flabbergasted lolYeah, he was a JAG in high school:
"Named to 2017 Miami Herald All-Dade First Team…Totaled over 1,000 yards receiving and 12 touchdowns throughout prep career…Hauled in 37 receptions for 619 yards and seven touchdowns during junior season…Registered 117 yards receiving and caught pair of touchdowns in 2017 FHSAA Regional Playoffs against Miami High School…Named to 2016 Miami Herald First Team All-Dade Football Team"
GC, come on man, you're stretching here. Pope has vastly underperformed expectations. But the kid was lighting in a bottle in HS, and his potential is incredible. I think he puts it together next year with a little more confidence working with King.
1000 yards & 12 TDs in 4 years is impressive to yall?? And the 200 yards his senior year is an accurate statMan the name Mark Pope rung bells even in Texas when he came to me with that stat line I was flabbergasted lol
1000 yards & 12 TDs in 4 years is impressive to yall?? And the 200 yards his senior year is an accurate stat
Mark Pope was a high 4-star player based on projection and its regarded as a good take because he was a high 4-star player...but its beyond some here to say that Tutu Atwell was misevaluated because decision makers did not actually project him, yet he was the county player of the year winning a state title and Mark Pope was a dece player for a 7-4 Southridge team getting bounced by Miami High (lol) in the playoffs.1000 yards & 12 TDs in 4 years is impressive to yall?? And the 200 yards his senior year is an accurate stat
This.awaiting Mike Jackson of Palmetto is this years TuTu Atwell 2.0
Couldnt answer it better myself.I stopped reading after a couple paragraphs. It's everything that's wrong with the discussion on evals.
"IF YOU CLAIM MIAMI MADE A BAD EVAL, so did over 60 other Power Five schools."
That's got to be amongst the most absurd things I've ever read on this site. You miss both the concept of evals and the reality of cfb recruiting. 60 schools aren't evaluating every kid in every region, or even every kid in miami. They may hit a radar screen but they ain't spending real time and resources on every kid they read about. Some kids become nationally recruited or regionally recruited because that's how the system works. Others slip through the cracks. Can be size, injuries, when they started playing, who played ahead of them, whether they made the camp circuit. Doesn't really matter. The point is that the local school is supposed to be the one that figures out which kids in its own back yard are worth offers, irrespective of what some idiotic recruiting services say. And surely irrespective of what the rest of D1 programs outside their backyard say.
Now you can try to say hindsight blah blah, but that's also an weak point. Because it's not even true, and it doesn't help anyone understand recruiting. This isn't some board game or recruiting site debate. Figuring out which kids to offer is the staff's effin job. And it's not just hindsight. If you learn who to pay attention to on the relevant UM sites, and there are several sites and several folks to pay attention to, you can quickly figure out that there's a pattern to the stupidity. There are plenty of kids over time that the locals knew would be good (or conversely not good), and UM staffs didn't take them, or did, because not only did they suck at evals, they also sucked at paying attention to information a fan with a computer could access.
If we were somehow hitting on evals well and it was a rare kid here or there, meh, that's random. But that ain't the truth. And there were people on this site talking about Atwell, the guy you responded to included. So you say hindsight because you think it makes you sound smart, while he was actually there with - get this - foresight. Meanwhile, it wasn't just Atwell. Elijah Moore wanted in that class and others on this site preferred him. No one I recall wanted Ezzard. That was just Dugans and Richt mis-evaluating WRs.
Go ***** yourself.
Atwell was in the Top 750 players. Schools can sign 25 players per year. To oversimplify for a moment, that means he could conceivably expect to snag an offer once the Top 30 recruiting classes are filled up. Which means (roughly) that Atwell would have been considered a "reach" for, say, the Top 20 to 25 recruiting classes. But that also means he was a prime target for at least 40 Power 5 programs.
Furthermore, Atwell went to Miami Northwestern. Not exactly a "fall through the cracks" school.
As for the rest of your delusional post, it's largely based on some concept that the coaches pay attention to the boards in order to do recruiting. Bottom line, this thread is about TuTu Atwell, not every single WR that Miami has recruited for 20 years.
And on the subject of evals, it is NOT Miami's "job" to evaluate every kid in SoFla for the benefit of every other program in the country. If Miami wanted to change TuTu's position from QB to WR, that is up to them. We were not interested in taking a developmental ATH who we would convert from QB to WR. We took 4 WRs who were already WRs.
Just goes to show the most important thing to look for in a recruit is high school production. And with a quarterback I like to look at win loss record. Jarren was like .500 or close to it in high school. This 7v7 camp stuff is only to supplement actual gamesI never knew his actual stat line from real ball. I knew he was a superstar flag football player and his route running skills and open field ability looked like it would translate to the next level. No way should we have taken him if that was his stat line.
Roscoe was a local legend as well...so im not sure what you getting at there.No. I recognize your need to keep it real and embrace the “local legend” mystique of an otherwise ok undersized slot receiver who has about the same production as Mike Harley. I don’t. He’s been underwhelming this year, inconsistent his entire career, and will struggle to make (and remain on) an NFL roster.
Dont think this thread is killed. I think we see something similar with Jackson in his recruitment like we do with s.fla smaller wr's. This thread is good right now imoAnother thread killed. Mods please make a thread titled "thread killers" so they can post whatever topics they want to discuss so we can try to keep threads on topic.
I know i addressed it in other post. But you are literally wrong about all of this you wrote. HE DID EVERYTHING YOU SAID LOL.Hilarious.
Here's some shocking news for you...NO recruiting service gives a WR rating to a kid that plays QB. Regardless of size.
Mind...blown.
The whole "size" issue is just you whining. If Atwell was so fired up to play WR...hmmm...let's see...he could have refused the QB offer from FAU...he could have contacted Rivals/247 to be listed as an ATH instead of a QB...he could have used the summer to train as a WR and put some of his sweet, sweet WR moves on tape.
But...THERE WAS NO TAPE. There's no tape of TuTu Atwell playing WR.
Nobody is "relying on recruiting services". Over 120 Division I-A schools could have offered Atwell. Very few did. Don't be mad at me for stating facts.