FullyERicht
Thunderdome
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 5,591
This case is no different from the one that wiped out wins and resulted in four years of bowl bans at PSU. It's not about whether Jameis is guilty; it's about the school not fulfilling it's title IX obligations and thus breaking federal law in an effort to win football games. It's the exact same precedent that Emmert slammed PSU for.
Not really, the school tried to cover up the Penn state situation, this one was all law enforcement. Te school acted, the police didn't.
The school acted about a year later than what the law requires.
You are incorrect.
They interviewed Winston immediately: he plead the "5th"
Nobody outside of the "rape counseling" office is allowed to talk to the girl of she refuses to press charges.
Casher and Darby were interviewed "a year later" because that's when FSU first heard about their involvement.
The girl also too e police Casher wasn't in the cab or apartment.
Winston lawyred up, and the girl probably didn't want an investigation.
The truth will come out eventually.
If FSU was just going to "cover it up" why wait a year and get the Feds curious?
That Isnt very good conspiracy planning.
Jesus Christ you Noles really are mentally deficient. The police contacted him, but the school didn't investigate for over a year, and only after it became a national news story.
This is the exact message of the article, and of course it went completely over your head.