forums

Mario is a ******* Idiot

Advertisement
I know y’all will disagree, but I kind of have a hard time seeing Mario being at Miami after next year. I even think it’ll be a stretch for two more. The university should be sitting back and looking at where the return on investment truly is. I was a huge fan of his hiring, but now I really question does he have the fire for the job. Or even the want to.
 
Number1CanesFan said:
You make no sense. Emotional conjecture. We had an opportunity to go up by 2 scores after the last FG, but you and other want to go back to the FG as the issue. They could have sealed the game on the 2nd to last drive.
Click to expand...
No emotion about it. We've been running the ball down their throat all game long. Run the ball on 2nd, 3rd and 4th down. It's called imposing your will on the opponent. But Dawson throws a pass on 2nd down for some stupid reason when Emory hasn't done a thing throwing the ball, we get stuffed on 3rd down and kick a FG on 4th down. Yes, we got the ball back after that with a chance to go up 2 scores, but that drive went nowhere, which is EXACTLY why you go for the TD from the 2-yard line. Don't agree, great, but it is not emotional conjecture
 
561caneforever said:
So you were confident that the Defense would not give up a touchdown for the rest of the game?
Click to expand...
No, but the defense did get a stop giving the offense an opportunity to seal the game, but wound up punting.

Mario knew his team was running the ball well. If ISU had scored a TD on their 2nd to last drive, Miami would only need a FG to win instead of of TD if he went for thr 4th and goal and failed. They would have eaten up the clock and kick the game winning FG.

The iss was not doing anything on the 2nd to last drive. You and others want to ignore that FACT. All they ad to do was salt the game away running the ball on the 2nd to last drive. Instead, Daemwsin calls a a pass play that got batted down putting us off schedule.

Ball in hand with the opportunity to put it away. That was the failure not the FG.
 
Advertisement
IbzRlz said:
Just like he thought he could stop Syracuse when he kicked the FG, and they got the ball back with just over 5 minutes remaining and ran out the clock. Dude is a complete idiot who never learns
Click to expand...
Exactly this, I seriously can’t believe he did it again. Well, actually, yes I can because he’s a ******* chump and coaches scared as ****.
 
Advertisement
IbzRlz said:
No emotion about it. We've been running the ball down their throat all game long. Run the ball on 2nd, 3rd and 4th down. It's called imposing your will on the opponent. But Dawson throws a pass on 2nd down for some stupid reason when Emory hasn't done a thing throwing the ball, we get stuffed on 3rd down and kick a FG on 4th down. Yes, we got the ball back after that with a chance to go up 2 scores, but that drive went nowhere, which is EXACTLY why you go for the TD from the 2-yard line. Don't agree, great, but it is not emotional conjecture
Click to expand...
Your logic makes no sense. It's judt conjecture.

You say we should have went for the 4th and goal, then go on to agree that we had a chance to put the game awa, but say we should have gone for the TD because we failed to put the game away. That 's real cute to go backward engineer your analysis.

Here's another one. Mario goes for it on 4th and goal and emwe don't get it. ISU marches down and scores a TD to go up by 4. Miami drives down needing a TD. They get thr ball inside the 20, but can't score a TD. Game over. ISU wins by 4.

Playing all situations out, it was absolutely the correct decision to tske the FG. It played out as Mario wanted getting the ball back up 6 with about 7 minutes left in the game.

You're trying to tell me it was a bad decision?

It's so funny that you base the decision to go for the TD is based on a future outcome that was unknown and turned out to be in Miami's fsvor and Miami's control. However, you make NO analysis of going for it on 4th & goal and failing. Nobody takes that into consideration. They assume a 4th & goal TD is given. We were at the 3 yard line and got stuffed on 3rd down. Sure, 4th down will work.
 
Number1CanesFan said:
Your logic makes no sense. It's judt conjecture.

You say we should have went for the 4th and goal, then go on to agree that we had a chance to put the game awa, but say we should have gone for the TD because we failed to put the game away. That 's real cute to go backward engineer your analysis.

Here's another one. Mario goes for it on 4th and goal and emwe don't get it. ISU marches down and scores a TD to go up by 4. Miami drives down needing a TD. They get thr ball inside the 20, but can't score a TD. Game over. ISU wins by 4.

Playing all situations out, it was absolutely the correct decision to tske the FG. It played out as Mario wanted getting the ball back up 6 with about 7 minutes left in the game.

You're trying to tell me it was a bad decision?

It's so funny that you base the decision to go for the TD is based on a future outcome that was unknown and turned out to be in Miami's fsvor and Miami's control. However, you make NO analysis of going for it on 4th & goal and failing. Nobody takes that into consideration. They assume a 4th & goal TD is given. We were at the 3 yard line and got stuffed on 3rd down. Sure, 4th down will work.
Click to expand...
Whatever dude. You have your agenda in defending Mario, and I disagree and think we should have went for the TD from the 2-yard line. It's ok to disagree
 
Advertisement
Number1CanesFan said:
What exactly did he do wrong?
Click to expand...
He kicked a field goal to go up 6 with a terrible defense while fielding a qb he clearly doesn't trust to throw the ball against a team that had punted only once in the game. It's a bowl game, you want to win 11 games in a season you have got to play to win. There were time management issues at the end of the game but IS throwing the ball twice on the 4 yard line with under two minutes left was pretty stupid also.
 
IbzRlz said:
Kicking a FG in the 4th quarter of a bowl game from the 2-yard line to get a 6-point lead. ******* loser
Click to expand...
Forget that! All those dudes that played and didn’t have too. What the *** did they play for to watch Williams get a tryout in the second half? WTF???! He BTW, news flash, he’s not good! 3 win team with him starting next year.
 
Advertisement
Who you are ,
Number1CanesFan said:
No, but the defense did get a stop giving the offense an opportunity to seal the game, but wound up punting.

Mario knew his team was running the ball well. If ISU had scored a TD on their 2nd to last drive, Miami would only need a FG to win instead of of TD if he went for thr 4th and goal and failed. They would have eaten up the clock and kick the game winning FG.

The iss was not doing anything on the 2nd to last drive. You and others want to ignore that FACT. All they ad to do was salt the game away running the ball on the 2nd to last drive. Instead, Daemwsin calls a a pass play that got batted down putting us off schedule.

Ball in hand with the opportunity to put it away. That was the failure not the FG.
Click to expand...
you no nothing and your logic your spewing is wrong.. It’s not even an opinion. Run run run and you win it’s that fckn simple. Just like GT and Syracuse mario always makes dumb decisions that are not conducive to winning.. WAKE UP.. I thought he was just good for two losses a season on his own, but I was off one..
 
JASONCOEM said:
Who you are ,

you no nothing and your logic your spewing is wrong.. It’s not even an opinion. Run run run and you win it’s that fckn simple. Just like GT and Syracuse mario always makes dumb decisions that are not conducive to winning.. WAKE UP.. I thought he was just good for two losses a season on his own, but I was off one..
Click to expand...
By the way, change your name to number one Mario fan
 
Canes_fan19 said:
I know y’all will disagree, but I kind of have a hard time seeing Mario being at Miami after next year. I even think it’ll be a stretch for two more. The university should be sitting back and looking at where the return on investment truly is. I was a huge fan of his hiring, but now I really question does he have the fire for the job. Or even the want to.
Click to expand...

I disagree with the idea that the people in charge care about ROI. They got their guy.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top