dudenate
[]__[] []\/[]
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,539
Interesting thread. Both sides have good points.
I consider myself a realist...not a downer or doom-&-gloomer and certainly not a O & G glasses guy. That being said, Los' observations with the program, I believe, are correct. We're a middle of the pack ACC team. We've got some things going for us while they are many things that UM does not have, that other programs have that attract kids. Win a few then lose a few. Every now and then (the Clappy/Radio era), we'll beat a decent G. Tech/OU/O$U,f$u team...but for the most part, on the field, we're average. We lose games we should win (albiet by small margins...K. St., f$u, etc) but lose them nonetheless. Good teams consistanly win games when teams 'get up to play them.' When 'Bama or Oregon go marching in to visitor's place (that lolely home team's biggest game of the year) and dilly dally around for a possession or two...they seem to turn it on and pull out a victory. We haven't (or can't) do that.
D$'s recruiting assessment isn't far off either. Look back at the consensus #1 recruits who UM has pulled (or have been commited here) in the past few years...DJ, Wright, Berlin, Authur, Bryce, Willie W, L. McCoy, S. Henderson, Duke. The UM brand and the team (and coaches) attract top rated talent. Our classes have rarely been rated #1 or 2...but we're typcially in the top 20's or so recruiting class-wise. Randy did bring in highly rated players. IMO, Randy (& the revolving door staffs) did not fill the in class well...or develop the kids that were brought in.
IMO, there is no 'one' thing that has gone wrong with the program lately...i believe it's a combo of a few things. IMO, our recruiting has been on par with what UM has brought in in the past. We have not evaluated or developed our kids well. I'm one that thinks UM should give Gold some time to see what he and (hopefully) an intact staff can do. We didn't become mediocre overnight and won't get really good overnight. This class can help. The next one can too. But it's gonna take time.
(just my thoughts)
I consider myself a realist...not a downer or doom-&-gloomer and certainly not a O & G glasses guy. That being said, Los' observations with the program, I believe, are correct. We're a middle of the pack ACC team. We've got some things going for us while they are many things that UM does not have, that other programs have that attract kids. Win a few then lose a few. Every now and then (the Clappy/Radio era), we'll beat a decent G. Tech/OU/O$U,f$u team...but for the most part, on the field, we're average. We lose games we should win (albiet by small margins...K. St., f$u, etc) but lose them nonetheless. Good teams consistanly win games when teams 'get up to play them.' When 'Bama or Oregon go marching in to visitor's place (that lolely home team's biggest game of the year) and dilly dally around for a possession or two...they seem to turn it on and pull out a victory. We haven't (or can't) do that.
D$'s recruiting assessment isn't far off either. Look back at the consensus #1 recruits who UM has pulled (or have been commited here) in the past few years...DJ, Wright, Berlin, Authur, Bryce, Willie W, L. McCoy, S. Henderson, Duke. The UM brand and the team (and coaches) attract top rated talent. Our classes have rarely been rated #1 or 2...but we're typcially in the top 20's or so recruiting class-wise. Randy did bring in highly rated players. IMO, Randy (& the revolving door staffs) did not fill the in class well...or develop the kids that were brought in.
IMO, there is no 'one' thing that has gone wrong with the program lately...i believe it's a combo of a few things. IMO, our recruiting has been on par with what UM has brought in in the past. We have not evaluated or developed our kids well. I'm one that thinks UM should give Gold some time to see what he and (hopefully) an intact staff can do. We didn't become mediocre overnight and won't get really good overnight. This class can help. The next one can too. But it's gonna take time.
(just my thoughts)
Last edited: