- Joined
- Apr 28, 2014
- Messages
- 16,463
Good, cost: performance is the main reason I preferred Mendoza. But the less we gave Beck to come here, it just makes it clear it was our best option by far...That’s not it either
Good, cost: performance is the main reason I preferred Mendoza. But the less we gave Beck to come here, it just makes it clear it was our best option by far...That’s not it either
dude asks for gray poupon at tailgatesIt’s a college football message board with a bunch of dudes on it.
Your expectation seems to be the thing that’s the problem.
That’s not it either
Good, cost: performance is the main reason I preferred Mendoza. But the less we gave Beck to come here, it just makes it clear it was our best option by far...
Florida overpaid for a bunch of players this recruiting cycle.Yeah you're probably right. The discussion was over the 2.5 mil we apparently paid Beck and he said we're just overpaying players so I was looking for a Lagway number for reference but couldn't find one.
Maybe it won't make a difference for an individual player or two, but I absolutely believe it makes a difference as a whole. Idc what anyone says there is a major difference to the quality of surrounding talent you can acquire when you're spending $2M on a QB instead of $4M. Period. Just logically say we lose a good player cause they wanted $50k more. Say that happens 5 times. All that **** does add up.But why are you worried about the money that our millionaire/billionaire boosters spend? We are not going to "not sign a WR or CB" because we spent a bit more on a QB.