K9Cane's Korner - Buzzed

[Bigtip]

every day that F/A/G is still here does more damage to the program. fire that ******* today

 

[Bigtip]

Yes......you almost wonder if this is intentional at this point. .he got butt hurt about not getting that Pedo state job,and got caught looking. As much as we all dislike him....he can't be this stupid to keep trotting out the same garbage over and over again. ...I wonder if he is daring UM to fire him???

it almost seems like that at this point. the way we played GT was unfathomable. it is literally the opposite of what you should do vs a triple option. just unreal

 

[miamiphd]

Golden should stick to recruiting and hire coordinators who know how to coach on the field. The D'nothing-io is lost, totally outclassed. Even Coley pulls some boners. I suppose Coley can be excused since he is developing a true freshman at QB and a group of young receivers, plus a depleted O-line. But, the defense has to be revamped. The loss of key players like Quan and Figueroa doesn't excuse D'nothing-io. His defenses simply are in the wrong place at the wrong time. 4-star D-backs who play 10 yards off the receivers. Opposing RBs who run 7 yards before being touched by our LBs. We have hefty DL men in the two JUCO transfers, plus Pierre who has matured into a genuine NFL pick, and freshman Moten (4-star recruit). Perryman is the heart and soul of the D. Armbrister is exceeding expectations. Kirby is starting to justify his 4-star high school status. D'nothing-io cannot blame lack of talent. The guy has to go. If Golden won't find someone better, then he has to go too. Remember, the beloved Bobby Bouden did not field coach. He simply recruited and served as CEO. Guys like Jimbo Fisher were the brains. Golden can recruit. Now he has to find the Xs and Os coordinators.

 

[miamiphd]

Golden is a good recruiter and team leader, but he needs to find better coordinators. D'nothing-io is lost. He cannot claim lack of talent. Sure, we miss Quan and Figueroa, who were lost because of misdeeds. But, what about the 4-star DBs who play 10 yards off the receivers? We have two JUCO DL-men, plus Pierre who has matured into a NFL pick, and 4-star recruit Moten. Perryman is the heart and soul of the defense. Armbrister has exceeded expectations. Kirby is starting to play like a 4-star recruit. Yet, opposing RBs go untouched for 7 yards. D-nothing-io has to shoulder the blame for that. Even Coley pulls some boners, like the tunnel screen in the red zone that goes nowhere. But, Coley can be excused since he is working with a true freshman QB. D-nothing-io has to go. If Golden won't find a better D-coordinator, then he has to go too. Golden can recruit top players and manage the team. That is important and should be his main role. Remember, the beloved Bobby Bouden was not a field coaching genius, but he could recruit and manage the team. His coordinators, like Jimbo Fisher, were the brains of field coaching. Golden has to find better Xs and Os coaches, or else give up his job as the team's CEO.

 

[Awsi Dooger]

Here's a tweet from Tim Reynolds(@TimReynolds) that is about as damning as you can get:

"Canes have given up 300 rushing yards four times in last 15 games. That happened four times in 135 games before that." Now, beyond that, just remember this, this comes in an era where most teams throw the ball much more than they run.

LOL. Absolutely priceless. Yeah, it's a damning quote all right, but not the way you mean. I like Tim Reynolds sometimes but this is rank ignorance. He would be laughed out of the room in the circles I frequent, where tendencies are known and not merely guessed to fit the bias of the moment.

Reynolds obviously has no clue that college football and pro football are separate entities and don't necessarily follow the same trends. In college football 2/3 of the teams still run the ball more frequently than they throw it. That's why I prefer college for betting purposes. Some of the old standby NFL betting systems don't work to the same percentage as decades ago but nothing has changed in college. The read option has essentially replaced the triple option but the most successful versions rely on the run. More and more of them are hurrying up to run the ball, like Auburn. I suspect that trend will increase.

Early in the season it's typically closer to 40/60, with maybe 50 or 55 teams passing the ball more than they run it, and the other 70+ running more than 50% of the time. But deeper into the season as the weather worsens the percentage of teams with 50+% passing continues to drop, until it generally includes no more than maybe 45.

http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/passing-play-pct

 

[BigPoopaCane]

That dude is such a boring, self-important blowhard. His football 'analysis' isn't markedly better than DBC's or one of the prepubescent kids on CIS, but he's been cranking out the unreadable bilge for over a decade, while seemingly under the impression that he's some big time writer.

Basically a teriyaki Joe Casale.

 

[caneaddict]

Here's a tweet from Tim Reynolds(@TimReynolds) that is about as damning as you can get:

"Canes have given up 300 rushing yards four times in last 15 games. That happened four times in 135 games before that." Now, beyond that, just remember this, this comes in an era where most teams throw the ball much more than they run.

LOL. Absolutely priceless. Yeah, it's a damning quote all right, but not the way you mean. I like Tim Reynolds sometimes but this is rank ignorance. He would be laughed out of the room in the circles I frequent, where tendencies are known and not merely guessed to fit the bias of the moment.

Reynolds obviously has no clue that college football and pro football are separate entities and don't necessarily follow the same trends. In college football 2/3 of the teams still run the ball more frequently than they throw it. That's why I prefer college for betting purposes. Some of the old standby NFL betting systems don't work to the same percentage as decades ago but nothing has changed in college. The read option has essentially replaced the triple option but the most successful versions rely on the run. More and more of them are hurrying up to run the ball, like Auburn. I suspect that trend will increase.

Early in the season it's typically closer to 40/60, with maybe 50 or 55 teams passing the ball more than they run it, and the other 70+ running more than 50% of the time. But deeper into the season as the weather worsens the percentage of teams with 50+% passing continues to drop, until it generally includes no more than maybe 45.

http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/stat/passing-play-pct

goes to show that Miami is not running nearly enough, which given the fact that they have more talent than 80% of their opponents and have a horrible defense is a terrible strategy

 

[Miami82]

That dude is such a boring, self-important blowhard. His football 'analysis' isn't markedly better than DBC's or one of the prepubescent kids on CIS, but he's been cranking out the unreadable bilge for over a decade, while seemingly under the impression that he's some big time writer.

Basically a teriyaki Joe Casale.

LMAO... nailed it.