SFbayCane
All American
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 18,910
I'll be frank. If any of that is true about Ponce and Gattis nobody, including Mario, gets a pass
1. If Ponce simply checked out and did not perform his job, he should've been fired. Anyone else here able to not show up and keep cashing checks?
2. If he deemed Gattis unfit and not a team player he should've been fired mid season and Ponce handed the keys until the end.
3. If it's true, Mario should've sat their asses down to come to an understanding, at least for this season, and then assess year end changes. He might've done so. I hope so. And if he did, see 1 and 2
No excuse for putting up with any of that without repercussions.
Again, this is assuming these reports are true. I do not claim to know one way or another.
I actually knew that this take would be posted in response to what Rickd and I posted here. I am a bit surprised it was you. Always thought you were sharper than that, mirvin. lol
Seriously though. Situations like this are easy to look at from the outside and say what you just said, but in real life its way more complex. Coaches have to protect their own resume, protect their own income, and protect their own marketability. Have you ever worked for an incompetent manager? I have. Its among the most difficult things to deal with. That manager was hired and put in place by the person above them, hence that person does not want the manager to be exposed as being incompetent as it reflects poorly on that senior person for hiring them. That's my read on this situation.
If Mario were to fire Gattis mid-season (which I preferred) then Gattis becomes a negative asset in the marketplace to help other teams negatively recruit against UM. My 'guess' is that Mario felt the need to give Gattis all the rope he needed to hang himself this season, probably because Mario's long term plan had 2022 as a write-off season anyway.
It's a write-off, Jerry. They just write it off.