Josh Gattis (before its deleted)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
Are we sure our next OC isn’t already agreed upon? Could just be waiting for any firing issues before announcing.
No one is sure but why would we assume one has been locked up? If it was, I would think they would move forward with the new oc and work out the gattis problems behind the scenes instead of holding the whole program hostage
 
Are we sure our next OC isn’t already agreed upon? Could just be waiting for any firing issues before announcing.
Zero chance that wouldn’t leak out. The idea that we have an agreement with a new OC, yet there haven’t been any leaks from UM, the new OC’s camp, and the new OC’s current school (unless it’s Arroyo) is just unrealistic in this day and age.
 
Here’s something to laugh at to dull the pain




danny mcbride GIF
 
Advertisement
Are we sure our next OC isn’t already agreed upon? Could just be waiting for any firing issues before announcing.
I think having a OC already agreed upon would only work if it’s an unemployed coach or NFL guy. I wouldn’t think a Head Coach from another school would be alright with waiting for Mario to make his move.
 
I love how this whole discussion everyone is purposely acting blind as to who is actually being discussed lmao.

That initial guy said "insiders" but hes really just pointing at one guy and I have a feeling we all know who.

But everyone is chiming in to protect insiders as a whole now bc they think cribby is under attack.

The last few pages aren't about cribby. I suspect they are about whoever claimed Gattis to PSU was done.
5ED8E585-76FF-4A97-8E43-1A010783967F.gif


Then don’t beat around the bush and just say his name. I will. Ya’ll are talking about @SWFLHurricane.

He shared what he heard. Looks like in this case, things changed or he got bad info. It happens.
 
Advertisement
Besides a giant ***** up from the Miami side, this is about the only scenario that makes any kind of sense
If substance issues are the case, they could fire him for cause and it should be over last month. Look at usc and sark

My buddy worked at a company where someone was coming in drunk, sleeping at his desk, breath smelled like alcohol, etc.

You would think he'd be immediately fired, but apparently being an alcoholic falls under having a medical disability or something, so he could sue for discrimination lol.

So they had to go through this process of putting him on a performance plan and all this stuff to finally be able to fire him like 3 months later, pretty crazy.
 
They were actually 60th. Alabama was 72, Ohio State was 85, and Oklahoma was 101. The diff between Oregon and LSU that year was 6 passes a game.
Team Rankings only uses stats between fbs teams so I use Them. I don’t care how any team performs against an fcs team they can overpower with their 3rd team and is over by halftime.


And a difference in 6 pass attempts per game is about 60 more yds per game (based on LSU’s ypa ) and 700-800 yds per season. For every 100 yds, that usually equates To 1 more TD, so it’s not negligible as I think you are implying
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
It’s on the lawyers and/or the business decision maker in the Administration who’s in charge of this area, I assume the AD.

People need to stop desperately trying to link every aspect of a failed situation to Mario. Like I said, his failure was choosing the guy not the contract.
Agreed but also Mario had input on the amount of money on the contract while negotiating from a position of power.

He paid his 4th option or whatever he was as if he was option #1 when not necessary so he spilled the milk and now others are left to clean it up. It’s gotten messy and it’s on him for getting duped so I look at it as the buy out/negotiating getting out of the contract difficulties are on him as well.

He can’t be absolved of this last messy divorce because of contract language issues or whatever it maybe. It’s currently impacting this team and recruits/plans moving forward so that’s Mario’s responsibility to not let that happen.
 
View attachment 226159

Then don’t beat around the bush and just say his name. I will. Ya’ll are talking about @SWFLHurricane.

He shared what he heard. Looks like in this case, things changed or he got bad info. It happens.
I agree with you, I think that is who was clearly being called out. But RVA says cribby was also being called out.

Idk, only that initial poster can clearly identify who they were calling out. Wasnt my call out so idk what they meant for sure.

I just laughed at how everyone was tip toeing around the name and pretending it meant everyone (which according to rva, it did, or atleast more than just swfl).
 
If you post info you should be able take it on the chin when wrong especially if your so adamant about that said info.
I disagree.

I appreciate the guys here who act. The ones who put it out there.
Not so much the guys who just react.

My opinion.
 
Advertisement
My buddy worked at a company where someone was coming in drunk, sleeping at his desk, breath smelled like alcohol, etc.

You would think he'd be immediately fired, but apparently being an alcoholic falls under having a medical disability or something, so he could sue for discrimination lol.

So they had to go through this process of putting him on a performance plan and all this stuff to finally be able to fire him like 3 months later, pretty crazy.
Yeah that’s crazy. To me, that’s like saying a drunk driver can’t be prosecuted for injuries or deaths he caused because he’s an alcoholic
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
Back
Top