Sigma_Cane_7
Senior
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2013
- Messages
- 5,934
Best part of that film was how no tackler wanted no parts of him one on one. Very intimidating player. I see no Jelani Hamilton in this kid.
Jesus Christ. Idt I've ever seen anything like that lol He's gotta be one of the most underrated players in the nation. That is ELITE athletism at that size.
You are making an unfair comparison. This guy's tape is absurd. Someone below says it's the best he's seen since P Buch. That's 17 years ago. Not saying that's right but the point is, you're trying to claim Haskins isn't an athletic specimen by pointing to a freak.This guy embodies why I am in disagree with labeling Haskins a "physical specimen" or some sort of athletic marvel.
They're roughly the same size. Jackson is more explosive, more fluid, has smoother running mechanics, and accelerates quicker.
You are making an unfair comparison. This guy's tape is absurd. Someone below says it's the best he's seen since P Buch. That's 17 years ago. Not saying that's right but the point is, you're trying to claim Haskins isn't an athletic specimen by pointing to a freak.This guy embodies why I am in disagree with labeling Haskins a "physical specimen" or some sort of athletic marvel.
They're roughly the same size. Jackson is more explosive, more fluid, has smoother running mechanics, and accelerates quicker.
Haskins looks like a very good athletic specimen. He's not as fast or fluid as Johnson. Ok. He still has hands, can run, has agility, played QB, HB and TE in HS, and looks like a kid who could be a real solid TE or even DL if he keeps growing.
This guy embodies why I am in disagree with labeling Haskins a "physical specimen" or some sort of athletic marvel.
They're roughly the same size. Jackson is more explosive, more fluid, has smoother running mechanics, and accelerates quicker.
This guy's tape is absurd...you're trying to claim Haskins isn't an athletic specimen by pointing to a freak.
He's not as fast or fluid as Johnson.
This guy embodies why I am in disagree with labeling Haskins a "physical specimen" or some sort of athletic marvel.
They're roughly the same size. Jackson is more explosive, more fluid, has smoother running mechanics, and accelerates quicker.
This guy's tape is absurd...you're trying to claim Haskins isn't an athletic specimen by pointing to a freak.
He's not as fast or fluid as Johnson.
Well yeah that's kind of my point. Jackson is a freak show. He's an athletic marvel and a head turner. That's why I'm comparing the two. If people are going to label Haskins as such, here is your benchmark. This is the type of physical monster you're talking about when you throw those terms around.
Haskins doesn't come close.
This guy embodies why I am in disagree with labeling Haskins a "physical specimen" or some sort of athletic marvel.
They're roughly the same size. Jackson is more explosive, more fluid, has smoother running mechanics, and accelerates quicker.
This guy's tape is absurd...you're trying to claim Haskins isn't an athletic specimen by pointing to a freak.
He's not as fast or fluid as Johnson.
Well yeah that's kind of my point. Jackson is a freak show. He's an athletic marvel and a head turner. That's why I'm comparing the two. If people are going to label Haskins as such, here is your benchmark. This is the type of physical monster you're talking about when you throw those terms around.
Haskins doesn't come close.
Different kind of athletes but both are great athletes no doubt. Its like trying to compare Gronk and Jimmy Graham..Who is the real freak? The answer is they both are its just their makeup is different. Frankenstein can be created in different ways.
This guy embodies why I am in disagree with labeling Haskins a "physical specimen" or some sort of athletic marvel.
They're roughly the same size. Jackson is more explosive, more fluid, has smoother running mechanics, and accelerates quicker.
This guy's tape is absurd...you're trying to claim Haskins isn't an athletic specimen by pointing to a freak.
He's not as fast or fluid as Johnson.
Well yeah that's kind of my point. Jackson is a freak show. He's an athletic marvel and a head turner. That's why I'm comparing the two. If people are going to label Haskins as such, here is your benchmark. This is the type of physical monster you're talking about when you throw those terms around.
Haskins doesn't come close.
Different kind of athletes but both are great athletes no doubt. Its like trying to compare Gronk and Jimmy Graham..Who is the real freak? The answer is they both are its just their makeup is different. Frankenstein can be created in different ways.
That's where I guess I disagree with a lot on here.
I think Haskins is a nice tight end. Moves pretty well for his size. Has a great frame. I'm just taking exception to some of the big time labels being thrown on him. I'm arguing Jackson is the type of athlete that deserves those type of "freak" labels. Their tapes don't lie. When you watch Jackson you're sitting there screaming "holy shlt!" because you shouldn't be able to do that at that size.
Haskins is a nice tight end prospect with above average athleticism, but he's not dropping jaws the way Jackson is.
impressive !!
First play he decapitates a guy--second play he outruns Bruce for a score.