forums

2024 Jeremiah Smith 2.0 ,,, Signs with Taint

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Udynasty said:
For example:

Here is the 247 headline and graphic on X. Right in bold letters , look a that quote from dad that they chose to showcase and now tell me there is no agenda here:

Click to expand...

He does say, do what makes you happy. Dad could be saying don’t chase the potential NFL bag at Ohio state annd be miserable over playing with your friends and being genuinely happy at Miami because the NIL stuff is going to work itself out.
 
PennsylvaniaCane said:
And Beards development of a bunch of 3* WR is far more impressive than Hartline taking a 5* WR and doing what with him? Getting him to play like a 5*?
Click to expand...
I don't understand this criticism of Hartline. Yea, it may be easier to get elite players to meet their potential than development players. The point is he has been excelling at getting players of Smith's caliber to the NFL; which is the ultimate goal. Many other schools, like Miami, can't say the same.
 
Advertisement
Wake_Cane said:
It is absolutely intentionally deceptive and intended to have the exact effect on readers we saw play out right here. Don't make excuses for this sleaze.
Click to expand...


Yeah, jnf is straight bull****ting. Trying to gaslight us into thinking that THIS Taint article was fair-and-balanced and not-at-all-motivated-by-deception.

First off, here is the headline/subheadline:


Everybody's after Jeremiah Smith, but what does the nation's No. 1 recruit want?​

Schools are "throwing all types of money" at 2024 receiver Jeremiah Smith, in his words. The Smiths, though, say they don't care about that. With a Signing Day decision 24 hours away, what does Smith really want? And what does that say about Ohio State or the in-state Florida powers pursuing him?​




Quite honestly, this is an IMMEDIATE attempt to deceive, that sets the reader's mind in the CURRENT time period, which overwhelms the EVENTUAL whispered truth of "oh, these quotes are from October". Look at the verbs. They are CURRENT tense. What does JJ "want" (now)? Schools "are" throwing money at JJ (now). The Smiths "say" things (now). Oh, and with the SD decision 24 HOURS A WAY, what does JJ "really want" (now)? There is NOTHING in the headlines that even vaguely hints that you are about to be clobbered by recycled quotes from two months ago.

Then Brandon Marcello goes on a FIFTEEN PARAGRAPH digression, where he waxes poetic about JJ's work ethic and tight *** (that was just a test to see who is reading carefully) before finally reiterating the question in the headlines, about what JJ "really really wants".

And then there is the dead giveaway that shows, no matter what @jnf2257 falsely tries to claim, the entire article is INTENDED as deception. Because RIGHT BEFORE you are fed old quotes, HE TELLS YOU THAT "NOT MUCH HAS CHANGED". Literally, Brandon Marcello is telling us that the October quotes are still applicable, because "not much has changed". And then Brandon Marcello pulls the reverse psychology trick A SECOND TIME, by sandwiching his "possibility of a late flip" acknowledgement with yet another (old) pro-Taint quote. It's like jnf has never heard of negging.

But, yeah, we should all be grateful to @jnf2257 for saving us all from falling for that not-at-all-intended-to-be-deceptive, wonderfully objective Brandon Marcello article. It was so even-handed, in that it very briefly was honest enough to mention that some quotes were given in October.

Whatever.
 
BostonCanes47 said:
He does say, do what makes you happy. Dad could be saying don’t chase the potential NFL bag at Ohio state annd be miserable over playing with your friends and being genuinely happy at Miami because the NIL stuff is going to work itself out.
Click to expand...
sure and they intentionally omit that part.
 
Whatever happened to the whole hartline is an alcoholic and causing all sorts of rukus at taint and that he wont be back next year??
 
Advertisement
TheOriginalCane said:
Yeah, jnf is straight bull****ting. Trying to gaslight us into thinking that THIS Taint article was fair-and-balanced and not-at-all-motivated-by-deception.

First off, here is the headline/subheadline:

Everybody's after Jeremiah Smith, but what does the nation's No. 1 recruit want?​

Schools are "throwing all types of money" at 2024 receiver Jeremiah Smith, in his words. The Smiths, though, say they don't care about that. With a Signing Day decision 24 hours away, what does Smith really want? And what does that say about Ohio State or the in-state Florida powers pursuing him?​


Quite honestly, this is an IMMEDIATE attempt to deceive, that sets the reader's mind in the CURRENT time period, which overwhelms the EVENTUAL whispered truth of "oh, these quotes are from October". Look at the verbs. They are CURRENT tense. What does JJ "want" (now)? Schools "are" throwing money at JJ (now). The Smiths "say" things (now). Oh, and with the SD decision 24 HOURS A WAY, what does JJ "really want" (now)? There is NOTHING in the headlines that even vaguely hints that you are about to be clobbered by recycled quotes from two months ago.

Then Brandon Marcello goes on a FIFTEEN PARAGRAPH digression, where he waxes poetic about JJ's work ethic and tight *** (that was just a test to see who is reading carefully) before finally reiterating the question in the headlines, about what JJ "really really wants".

And then there is the dead giveaway that, no matter what @jnf2257 falsely tries to claim, the entire article is INTENDED as deception. Because RIGHT BEFORE you are fed old quotes, HE TELLS YOU THAT "NOT MUCH HAS CHANGED". Literally, Brandon Marcello is telling us that the October quotes are still applicable, because "not much has changed". And then Brandon Marcello pulls the reverse psychology trick A SECOND TIME, by sandwiching his "possibility of a late flip" with yet another (old) pro-Taint quote. It's like jnf has never heard of negging.

But, yeah, we should all be grateful to @jnf2257 for saving us all from falling for that not-at-all-intended-to-be-deceptive, wonderfully objective Brandon Marcello article. It was so even-handed, in that it very briefly was honest enough to mention that some quotes were given in October.

Whatever.
Click to expand...
Guy is facepalming everything I post, especially when he is being a *****.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
Yeah, jnf is straight bull****ting. Trying to gaslight us into thinking that THIS Taint article was fair-and-balanced and not-at-all-motivated-by-deception.

First off, here is the headline/subheadline:

Everybody's after Jeremiah Smith, but what does the nation's No. 1 recruit want?​

Schools are "throwing all types of money" at 2024 receiver Jeremiah Smith, in his words. The Smiths, though, say they don't care about that. With a Signing Day decision 24 hours away, what does Smith really want? And what does that say about Ohio State or the in-state Florida powers pursuing him?​


Quite honestly, this is an IMMEDIATE attempt to deceive, that sets the reader's mind in the CURRENT time period, which overwhelms the EVENTUAL whispered truth of "oh, these quotes are from October". Look at the verbs. They are CURRENT tense. What does JJ "want" (now)? Schools "are" throwing money at JJ (now). The Smiths "say" things (now). Oh, and with the SD decision 24 HOURS A WAY, what does JJ "really want" (now)? There is NOTHING in the headlines that even vaguely hints that you are about to be clobbered by recycled quotes from two months ago.

Then Brandon Marcello goes on a FIFTEEN PARAGRAPH digression, where he waxes poetic about JJ's work ethic and tight *** (that was just a test to see who is reading carefully) before finally reiterating the question in the headlines, about what JJ "really really wants".

And then there is the dead giveaway that, no matter what @jnf2257 falsely tries to claim, the entire article is INTENDED as deception. Because RIGHT BEFORE you are fed old quotes, HE TELLS YOU THAT "NOT MUCH HAS CHANGED". Literally, Brandon Marcello is telling us that the October quotes are still applicable, because "not much has changed". And then Brandon Marcello pulls the reverse psychology trick A SECOND TIME, by sandwiching his "possibility of a late flip" with yet another (old) pro-Taint quote. It's like jnf has never heard of negging.

But, yeah, we should all be grateful to @jnf2257 for saving us all from falling for that not-at-all-intended-to-be-deceptive, wonderfully objective Brandon Marcello article. It was so even-handed, in that it very briefly was honest enough to mention that some quotes were given in October.

Whatever.
Click to expand...
The bold portion of the first paragraph is everything you need to know. Propaganda for OSU.

Still It was my bad for providing the board without out of context quotes. I apologize to everyone .
 
Udynasty said:
For example:

Here is the 247 headline and graphic on X. Right in bold letters , look a that quote from dad that they chose to showcase and now tell me there is no agenda here:

Click to expand...

Yep. And to the guy who keeps making excuses saying it was clear...if you look below the dads quote they blatantly lie by asserting the dad said that TODAY. ("with signing day 24 hours away")
 
Advertisement
TheOriginalCane said:
Yeah, jnf is straight bull****ting. Trying to gaslight us into thinking that THIS Taint article was fair-and-balanced and not-at-all-motivated-by-deception.

First off, here is the headline/subheadline:


Everybody's after Jeremiah Smith, but what does the nation's No. 1 recruit want?​

Schools are "throwing all types of money" at 2024 receiver Jeremiah Smith, in his words. The Smiths, though, say they don't care about that. With a Signing Day decision 24 hours away, what does Smith really want? And what does that say about Ohio State or the in-state Florida powers pursuing him?​




Quite honestly, this is an IMMEDIATE attempt to deceive, that sets the reader's mind in the CURRENT time period, which overwhelms the EVENTUAL whispered truth of "oh, these quotes are from October". Look at the verbs. They are CURRENT tense. What does JJ "want" (now)? Schools "are" throwing money at JJ (now). The Smiths "say" things (now). Oh, and with the SD decision 24 HOURS A WAY, what does JJ "really want" (now)? There is NOTHING in the headlines that even vaguely hints that you are about to be clobbered by recycled quotes from two months ago.

Then Brandon Marcello goes on a FIFTEEN PARAGRAPH digression, where he waxes poetic about JJ's work ethic and tight *** (that was just a test to see who is reading carefully) before finally reiterating the question in the headlines, about what JJ "really really wants".

And then there is the dead giveaway that shows, no matter what @jnf2257 falsely tries to claim, the entire article is INTENDED as deception. Because RIGHT BEFORE you are fed old quotes, HE TELLS YOU THAT "NOT MUCH HAS CHANGED". Literally, Brandon Marcello is telling us that the October quotes are still applicable, because "not much has changed". And then Brandon Marcello pulls the reverse psychology trick A SECOND TIME, by sandwiching his "possibility of a late flip" with yet another (old) pro-Taint quote. It's like jnf has never heard of negging.

But, yeah, we should all be grateful to @jnf2257 for saving us all from falling for that not-at-all-intended-to-be-deceptive, wonderfully objective Brandon Marcello article. It was so even-handed, in that it very briefly was honest enough to mention that some quotes were given in October.

Whatever.
Click to expand...
They are Smith's exact words. That's not misleading.

My objection to what everyone else is *****ing about is thinking 247 is trying to mislead everyone that those quotes were recent quotes. It's very clearly spelled out for anyone that reads the story that the quotes are from October.

Stop being so sensitive to a ******* 247 story. You say you don't care about them but here you are *****ing and moaning.
 
E1k said:
This narrative has been proven false but idc lol keep repeating it, everything helps at this point
Click to expand...
Lol. Math is math. If you have brought in 40 blue chips over the last 10 years and only put 8 of them in the league that’s 20%. Either your evals suck or you aren’t developing that talent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
Back
Top