Jan 13-15 OV pics/reactions

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm interested to see why you say that.


I'm not a sneakerhead at all, so I don't have a dog in this fight.

But one stock has risen 76% and one has essentially flatlined TTM.

Which company would you say is currently performing better?

I see your point and I'll be honest I didn't know the numbers. But I do have a few counter premises:

Adidas is currently performing better. But that rise could be because it was so far behind not only Nike, but had also been surpassed by UA in market share in 2015. So it had so much ground to make up to catch the 2 whereas Nike has plateaued and growth for them is marginal. Adidas either disappears or went up.

Second, adidas rose in a different stock market. I'm not saying for certain, but it is possible that growing that much in that market was easier than if it had to do that on our stock market.

Just a couple possible alternatives that I was thinking of.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk




Adidas is a foreign company, but that doesn't mean they're competing in a different market than Nike. They're both international companies that move product all over the globe.
 

Advertisement
I'm interested to see why you say that.


I'm not a sneakerhead at all, so I don't have a dog in this fight.

But one stock has risen 76% and one has essentially flatlined TTM.

Which company would you say is currently performing better?

I see your point and I'll be honest I didn't know the numbers. But I do have a few counter premises:

Adidas is currently performing better. But that rise could be because it was so far behind not only Nike, but had also been surpassed by UA in market share in 2015. So it had so much ground to make up to catch the 2 whereas Nike has plateaued and growth for them is marginal. Adidas either disappears or went up.

Second, adidas rose in a different stock market. I'm not saying for certain, but it is possible that growing that much in that market was easier than if it had to do that on our stock market.

Just a couple possible alternatives that I was thinking of.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk




Adidas is a foreign company, but that doesn't mean they're competing in a different market than Nike. They're both international companies that move product all over the globe.

True. My point was more of: is a 76% growth in their stock market the same as one in ours? So many factors including different accounting rules involved.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Advertisement
I'm interested to see why you say that.


I'm not a sneakerhead at all, so I don't have a dog in this fight.

But one stock has risen 76% and one has essentially flatlined TTM.

Which company would you say is currently performing better?

I see your point and I'll be honest I didn't know the numbers. But I do have a few counter premises:

Adidas is currently performing better. But that rise could be because it was so far behind not only Nike, but had also been surpassed by UA in market share in 2015. So it had so much ground to make up to catch the 2 whereas Nike has plateaued and growth for them is marginal. Adidas either disappears or went up.

Second, adidas rose in a different stock market. I'm not saying for certain, but it is possible that growing that much in that market was easier than if it had to do that on our stock market.

Just a couple possible alternatives that I was thinking of.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk




Adidas is a foreign company, but that doesn't mean they're competing in a different market than Nike. They're both international companies that move product all over the globe.

True. My point was more of: is a 76% growth in their stock market the same as one in ours? So many factors including different accounting rules involved.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, it is the same. It means the value of the company increased by 76%, there is no difference there.

Where companies are listed has more to do with where the base of operations of that company is/where it originated.

Some foreign companies get listed on the U.S exchanges mainly for the purpose of increased exposure to U.S investments. In terms of accounting for value, there is zero difference.
 
Last edited:
I'm not a sneakerhead at all, so I don't have a dog in this fight.

But one stock has risen 76% and one has essentially flatlined TTM.

Which company would you say is currently performing better?

I see your point and I'll be honest I didn't know the numbers. But I do have a few counter premises:

Adidas is currently performing better. But that rise could be because it was so far behind not only Nike, but had also been surpassed by UA in market share in 2015. So it had so much ground to make up to catch the 2 whereas Nike has plateaued and growth for them is marginal. Adidas either disappears or went up.

Second, adidas rose in a different stock market. I'm not saying for certain, but it is possible that growing that much in that market was easier than if it had to do that on our stock market.

Just a couple possible alternatives that I was thinking of.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk




Adidas is a foreign company, but that doesn't mean they're competing in a different market than Nike. They're both international companies that move product all over the globe.

True. My point was more of: is a 76% growth in their stock market the same as one in ours? So many factors including different accounting rules involved.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, it is the same. It means the value of the company increased by 76%, there is no difference there.

Where companies are listed has more to do with where the base of operations of that company is/where it originated.

Some foreign companies get listed on the U.S exchanges mainly for the purpose of increased exposure to U.S investments. In terms of accounting for value, there is zero difference.

Fair enough.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Mods. Please change thread title to "Adidas or Nike" and start a new OV thread.

TIA
 
Last edited:
Evidence Njoku is a TE all day.

No way that kid isn't already 215.

His brother was 215 when he came in.

He's a wr, you guys try to make anybody with size at wr a TE

He is going to be a big miss match against even average sized CBs. Word is Evidence is faster than his big bro. Going to be a baller for us.

Ppl are so adament hes a wr but when next yr the only tes we will have are irvin, haskins, and polendey there is a clear nedd, especially since haskins cant be relied upon to not get suspended.
plus in this class we are going after 2 top 100 wrs in thomas and smith, and 2 others in pouncey and harley in a class where we only need 3.
plus the dude is ******* big. anyone that doesnt believe this dude could be a TE is trippin.
 
Advertisement
Evidence Njoku is a TE all day.

No way that kid isn't already 215.

His brother was 215 when he came in.

He's a wr, you guys try to make anybody with size at wr a TE

Yeah cuz there are a ton of 6-6 215 pound receiver prospects.

GTFO. He's only going to grow. Njoku will be the next great TE at TE U.

Anything is possible, but THE STAFF SAYS HE'S COMING TO PLAY TE. I don't know how to make that any clearer.

Where you see that? From everything I've heard he's coming in at WR

Ahhh...my bad, you're totally right. I meant to say he was coming to play WR. I was specifically commenting on the posters who insist he's coming in at TE despite the staff saying they want him at WR.
 
Evidence Njoku is a TE all day.

No way that kid isn't already 215.

His brother was 215 when he came in.

He's a wr, you guys try to make anybody with size at wr a TE

Yeah cuz there are a ton of 6-6 215 pound receiver prospects.

GTFO. He's only going to grow. Njoku will be the next great TE at TE U.

Anything is possible, but THE STAFF SAYS HE'S COMING TO PLAY TE. I don't know how to make that any clearer.


You can't believe everything you hear - we also heard we'd be eating lunches with crossing routes, and over the middle passes.

Sorry, that was literally the opposite of what I meant to say. Maybe you can't believe what you hear but I'll stick with what the staff is saying over what dude's on here think. Just because he's tall doesn't mean he has to be a TE. As somebody pointed out, as long as he can get open he's a WR.
 
He's a wr, you guys try to make anybody with size at wr a TE

Yeah cuz there are a ton of 6-6 215 pound receiver prospects.

GTFO. He's only going to grow. Njoku will be the next great TE at TE U.

Anything is possible, but THE STAFF SAYS HE'S COMING TO PLAY TE. I don't know how to make that any clearer.


You can't believe everything you hear - we also heard we'd be eating lunches with crossing routes, and over the middle passes.

Sorry, that was literally the opposite of what I meant to say. Maybe you can't believe what you hear but I'll stick with what the staff is saying over what dude's on here think. Just because he's tall doesn't mean he has to be a TE. As somebody pointed out, as long as he can get open he's a WR.


We agree! But man! Lining up in the slot? He'd be a nightmare!
 
Advertisement
Wow I've learned more about apparel and rap music today than the recruits we have on campus. Can we stfu already and post some useful info since NSD is a couple weeks away.
 
Advertisement
[TWEET]820397444873723905[/TWEET]

Curious quote. I would be interested in knowing why he isn't supposed to be here. Never thought he'd make it? Never thought he'd get to college? Never thought he'd get to be a Cane? In any event, going to the next level is always exciting and nerve wracking.

[video=youtube;nMSmp1BbcVM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMSmp1BbcVM[/video]
 
[TWEET]820397444873723905[/TWEET]

Curious quote. I would be interested in knowing why he isn't supposed to be here. Never thought he'd make it? Never thought he'd get to college? Never thought he'd get to be a Cane? In any event, going to the next level is always exciting and nerve wracking.

[video=youtube;nMSmp1BbcVM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMSmp1BbcVM[/video]

Where's that video where he said he the best recruit in the country
 
Judging by Njoku size it's not wr vs te but can he play tackle our biggest area of need
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
Back
Top