brock
All-American
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
- Messages
- 40,669
Quit trying to use excuses to discredit somebody. Rumph Gets all the Criticism for guys he don’t land but the ones he do y’all want to put asterisks over Every recruit he does get. It don’t work like that and it’s pure hating imo which is a weak *** trait. Rumph kept frierson committed, you know banda didn’t with all of the blue chip decommitments he has had and it’s an extensive list...LOL:
U do realize that Banda was the lead recruiter for both Ivey & Frierson, correct?
U do realize that Richt was the one who initiated contact w/ Bandy & apologized for the previous staff for overlooking him, correct?
U do realize that a corpse would’ve recruited BLADES Jr to Miami, correct.
U do realize that Dean was dropped by Bama and he did chit here, correct?
Now, we can give Rumph complete credit for Williams, Dunson, Clarke, and Couche.
Don’t be like UF and just say this person is a 4 star, that person is a 4 star. Only Williams a true blue chip.
Couche was a fringe 3/4 star (not top 300)
Dunson is a fringe 3/4 star (not top 300)
Clarke is a 3 star (not top 300)
Rumph’s recruiting has left something to be desired, period.
The whole staff recruiting has left something to be desired, there is absolutely no reason to single him out over the others when he has done as good or BETTER than majority of them. That’s plain hating but do you. And if they are rated as a 4 star on the composite rankings which is what I use Then they are a **** 4 star. When they do those blue chip ratios they use ANY 4 star recruit and count them as a blue chip recruit.
Last edited: