Is the ACC a goner?

Advertisement
Rumors, not rumors.

Please (other teams) pay the $50,000,000 and go, leave who is left to collect. We will land on our feet, don't sweat it.
 
always a rumor but ill believe when theyre serious about paying the 50 million buyout. not everyone has an under armor ceo willing to help w the buyout
 
Advertisement
There is 0 chance the SEC takes those two schools. If they wanted to take two schools, they'd take FSU and Clemson.. or Texas and ______..

Not goign to waste their time with two schools that do nothing to enhance the conference.
 
There is 0 chance the SEC takes those two schools. If they wanted to take two schools, they'd take FSU and Clemson.. or Texas and ______..

Not goign to waste their time with two schools that do nothing to enhance the conference.

You have no clue what expansion is about. So Missouri enhanced the conference, did it?

The SEC would love to get into the VA and NC markets, which is exactly what they would get with VT and NCSU.
 
There is 0 chance the SEC takes those two schools. If they wanted to take two schools, they'd take FSU and Clemson.. or Texas and ______..

Not goign to waste their time with two schools that do nothing to enhance the conference.

You have no clue what expansion is about. So Missouri enhanced the conference, did it?

The SEC would love to get into the VA and NC markets, which is exactly what they would get with VT and NCSU.

Too Much Dilution IMO
 
VT and NC State fit the SEC's academic profile, but I'd have a hard time believing it

Miami to the Pac 12....oh look, I just started a rumor
 
Advertisement
VT and NC State fit the SEC's academic profile, but I'd have a hard time believing it

Miami to the Pac 12....oh look, I just started a rumor

Can u imagine traveling to eugene, cali, washington, zona all in one year? Thatd be ****** ruthless. Kinda like san jose state in the big east.
 
Advertisement
There is 0 chance the SEC takes those two schools. If they wanted to take two schools, they'd take FSU and Clemson.. or Texas and ______..

Not goign to waste their time with two schools that do nothing to enhance the conference.

You have no clue what expansion is about. So Missouri enhanced the conference, did it?

The SEC would love to get into the VA and NC markets, which is exactly what they would get with VT and NCSU.


The SEC is in the VA and NC markets. They're in the Cali market, the NY market, the Chicago market. Its called ESPN. Google it.
 
There is 0 chance the SEC takes those two schools. If they wanted to take two schools, they'd take FSU and Clemson.. or Texas and ______..

Not goign to waste their time with two schools that do nothing to enhance the conference.

You have no clue what expansion is about. So Missouri enhanced the conference, did it?

The SEC would love to get into the VA and NC markets, which is exactly what they would get with VT and NCSU.


The SEC is in the VA and NC markets. They're in the Cali market, the NY market, the Chicago market. Its called ESPN. Google it.

Wow, just wow. No wonder everyone says this place is becoming grassy 2.0.

Here's a hint for all of you, expansion has almost nothing to do with on-field performance. Once you figure that out, you'll be better off.
 
Advertisement
For 3 years it's the Same Ole Sht. This year, ACC upgrades by getting rid of Maryland, and all of a suddenly FSU, UNC, UVA, GT, UNC want to jump ship?
 
There is 0 chance the SEC takes those two schools. If they wanted to take two schools, they'd take FSU and Clemson.. or Texas and ______..

Not goign to waste their time with two schools that do nothing to enhance the conference.

LOL. Current members are blocking FSU and Clemson. VT and NCST get them into new markets. What UNC and Virginia are worried about is being left with Wake and Duke when the others jump.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Back
Top